Injectors
non-I/C'ed is also 155* correct?
still didn't answer my question...why not marine nozzles?? i'm not being a dick but i would like to know what is wrong with them. or what nozzle you think is better. i would like to get a bigger set of injectors sometime in the future, and knowing this stuff helps to make up my minde.
I woudl asumme that fro teh non-I/Ced engines it simply comes down to teh spray pattern.
Would a marine nozzle be a better choice for a non-I/C'ed piston then a 145* injector? or is there something else wrong?
Would a marine nozzle be a better choice for a non-I/C'ed piston then a 145* injector? or is there something else wrong?
the non I/C motors were classified as industrial/marine in 91.5 cummins had to start with emissions and the in a somewhat way reinvented the motor for use on the road
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
i ran the 145* injector (1993) with the 155* block (1990) for 300 miles then broke a valvespring pulled the head off the spray is all in the pre cup and laa looks good so i would not see a big issue with mixing the 145 and 155
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
i ran the 145* injector (1993) with the 155* block (1990) for 300 miles then broke a valvespring pulled the head off the spray is all in the pre cup and laa looks good so i would not see a big issue with mixing the 145 and 155
Last edited by big bad diesel 416; Dec 8, 2009 at 09:55 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
It has a bit to do with the spray pattern/bowl design and quench area, but the Marine nozzle in general does not seem to have a consistant wear pattern. Some will last and fire well for a long period of times, most will not. I am moving away from VCO nozzles in general, I feel this is the best option, I just have to settle on the Sac volume.





