5.9 Liter CR Dodge Cummins 03-07 Discussion of 5.9 Liter Dodge Cummins Diesels with Common Rail Injection

5.9 CR Versus 6.0 PSD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:30 PM
  #21  
Uncle Bubba's Avatar
BOMBARDIER
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,854
Likes: 1,112
From: Illinois?
Default

Originally Posted by Dr. Evil
If you were going to go with 7.3 Id say have at her. I wouldnt mind one of those myself. To be honest, this 12V has given me way more trouble than my 24V EVER HAS.

Besides, youve put way too much work into that 24V to give up on it now.

Dont be a stranger Andrew - Uncle Bubba get so lonely !!....
You aint kiddin, sometimes it gets so bad i gotta break down and talk to the Dr. just to get it off my chest.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:32 PM
  #22  
Dr. Evil's Avatar
BOMBARDIER
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 23,293
Likes: 1,322
From: North of You
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Bubba
You aint kiddin, sometimes it gets so bad i gotta break down and talk to the Dr. just to get it off my chest.
Its a good thing I have a thick perscription pad....
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 08:29 AM
  #23  
dalton06's Avatar
Diesel Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 489
Likes: 5
From: Canton, GA
Default

only reason to get a psd is nice sounding turbo and exhaust. Other than that stick with the ram
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #24  
piperca's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Diesel Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 5
Default

Okay, you'll be happy to know I bit the bullet and got a new vehicle. Not what I intended on getting, but it gets 32+mpg, 0-60 in 6.8 seconds and is turbocharged ... meet the new mistress:



She's identical to the one in the picture. I'll get some pics of mine when I get a chance.

BTW: I kept the old lass too!
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #25  
Johnny Cetane's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 493
From: Behind You
Default

Saabs have their oddities but I think they're sex on wheels. Nice choice.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #26  
adam05's Avatar
Diesel Fan
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville, Tn
Default

Well If I can fellas I would like to add the fact that I have a cousin that works at a dealer and he tells me that the that the Duramax and the PSD both have longevity issues between 60k and 80k due to the high boost used to build power in the two of them both really don't build good power until 35psi or better, as opposed to the Cummmins that releases at 32psi. Kind of makes sense considering strain placed on head bolts and the bottom end. There is a trade off though the Cummins is the worst when it comes to fuel economy but it all has to due to the boost used to build pressure.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #27  
mattyboy72's Avatar
Diesel Fan
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Lacombe Alberta
Default

is adam serious with the cummins havin the worst fuel economy, did i read that right my truck running with almost dead injectors idling all the time still goes almost 850kms too a tank and thats hammerin on her too
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:16 AM
  #28  
MotorOilMcCall's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 58
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

Originally Posted by adam05
Well If I can fellas I would like to add the fact that I have a cousin that works at a dealer and he tells me that the that the Duramax and the PSD both have longevity issues between 60k and 80k due to the high boost used to build power in the two of them both really don't build good power until 35psi or better, as opposed to the Cummmins that releases at 32psi. Kind of makes sense considering strain placed on head bolts and the bottom end. There is a trade off though the Cummins is the worst when it comes to fuel economy but it all has to due to the boost used to build pressure.
I sure hope you know how dumb that just made you sound . The Cummins have always been known for superior fuel economy, and the Duramax trucks have been getting closer since their debut. The Fords have never had any fuel mileage to brag about, being the worst of the 3. Longevity is hit and miss with ANY truck, but look at the facts and the PSD's have had BY FAR the most problems, resulting in over 500 vehicle buy backs due to numerous engine failures. In the same time frame, GM and Dodge have numbers in the single digits.

The reason the Cummins makes more power lower down is because its an I-6 design, not a V8. Boost plays its part, but shouldn't the engine be designed to handle it?

Ignorance is bliss...until it gets beaten out of ya right?

At least thats how I was raised...
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BeastFromTheEast
Ford Truck and Powerstroke Turbo Diesel Forum
2
Sep 14, 2015 02:25 PM
slowstroke
For Sale
1
Apr 1, 2015 11:35 AM
scubasteve12
Ford Powerstroke 03-07 6.0L
4
Mar 29, 2015 09:39 PM
Twinkie_Bomb
5.9 Liter CR Dodge Cummins 03-07
5
Mar 27, 2015 06:06 PM
thumperf350
Ford Powerstroke 03-07 6.0L
4
Jan 8, 2015 12:55 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.