Passenger Vehicles General Discussion General Diesel Discussion of all Passenger Vehicles with Diesel Engines

Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 Turbo Diesel Intercooler Fitting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 05:46 AM
  #1  
lancerevodiesel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Diesel Fan
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 Turbo Diesel Intercooler Fitting

Hi. I have a 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 turbo diesel 4d65 with a td04-09b turbo. I just fitted a front mounted intercooler & the boost pressure was reduced to 7 psi from 9 psi. Is this normal or is there something wrong? I had fitted a boost controller to turn the boost up to 10 psi. Also tested the piping for leaks and everything was ok with no leaks. I Also noticed more whistle coming from the cone filter. Is this normal?

Thank you very much.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #2  
2500HeavyDuty's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,872
Likes: 764
From: Houston, Tx
Default

Its it normal sometimes you do loose boost from addind an intercooler since it it restrictive. But the cooling benefits are much better.

I bet you also have your boost tap on the cool side (engine side) of the intercooler too.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #3  
Benjamin's Avatar
Bombardier
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 607
From: Da' Dirty South
Default

even though it is a couple pounds lower does it feel stronger?
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #4  
lancerevodiesel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Diesel Fan
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Yes at the same boost levels as before 9 psi it feels stronger but there is a little lag.

Thank you for your posts
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 12:07 AM
  #5  
2500HeavyDuty's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,872
Likes: 764
From: Houston, Tx
Default

are your egts lower?
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 02:28 AM
  #6  
lancerevodiesel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Diesel Fan
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

I don't know about egt's because, I am still wating for the gauge.
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 02:54 AM
  #7  
2500HeavyDuty's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,872
Likes: 764
From: Houston, Tx
Default

well they most likely are, whats next on the bomb list
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 03:29 AM
  #8  
lancerevodiesel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Diesel Fan
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Because of the fitting of the intercooler, I changed the intake manifold to the non turbo intake manifold which is much bigger than the turbo manifold. I did this because the non turbo intake manifold has a bigger inlet hole (60mm) and the turbo manifold was (40mm) Is this good?

Thanks
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 03:36 AM
  #9  
2500HeavyDuty's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,872
Likes: 764
From: Houston, Tx
Default

if there aren't any leaks i don't see why there would be a problem, do you have any pics of these manifolds?
 

Last edited by 2500HeavyDuty; Jun 5, 2008 at 03:44 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 08:58 PM
  #10  
Benjamin's Avatar
Bombardier
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 607
From: Da' Dirty South
Default

Originally Posted by lancerevodiesel
Because of the fitting of the intercooler, I changed the intake manifold to the non turbo intake manifold which is much bigger than the turbo manifold. I did this because the non turbo intake manifold has a bigger inlet hole (60mm) and the turbo manifold was (40mm) Is this good?

Thanks
if i was a betting man i'd say that that is where you lost 2 pounds of boost. with that big of a difference there is less resistance and therefore less boost.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.