Ford Truck and Powerstroke Turbo Diesel Forum Discussion of General Topics related to All Ford Trucks as well as the Diesels in them

Navistars Days Are Numbered......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #11  
DieselHardware's Avatar
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 18
From: San Dimas, CA
Default

Who says the Ford motor will fall on it's face.....only time will tell, but they have had a lot of time to get it right. I think it will be interesting to say the least. I think they have too much at stake to screw up.

What do you feel is so special about an I-6 over a V-8?
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 08:37 PM
  #12  
mysterync's Avatar
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 367
From: Blowing Rock,NC
Default

Navistar sucks.....Just look at the 5 PSD's outside my shop....
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #13  
AF1CUMMINS's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 54
From: Sumter, SC
Default

Well let's just look at this. Have you EVER seen or heard of a Powerstroke or Duramax or old 6.2 or 6.5 getting anywhere near the mileage before having to be rebuilt. The longevity of these motors is just incredible. I think it has a lot to do with eveyrthing going straight up and down instead of the "v" configuration. Look at even a gas motor for example. The old Ford 300 inline six. You could beat the hell out of those motors and they run forever and are torquey as hell. Jeep too, they're 4.0L inline six, another awesome example.

---AutoMerged DoublePost---

With the exception of the old Cat 3208 motors look at OTR trucks that run hundreds of thousands and some a million miles plus. ALL inline six motors and a vast majority of construction equipment as well.
 

Last edited by AF1CUMMINS; Sep 25, 2008 at 08:45 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 08:51 PM
  #14  
kbailey's Avatar
Diesel Wrench
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 572
Likes: 51
From: West Lafayette, IN -
Default

The worst part about navistar engines in ford trucks is the ford electronics. The same engines with navistar electronics run without trouble. Ford is also notorious for being hard for suppliers to work with. My buddy has several 2002 F350 rolling chassis' that a local company was using to develop a factory air ride system for ford. Needless to say ford's demands were such that the company dropped the project. Could you imagine if they had a factory air ride system that would fix the hay wagon suspension they currently use??? Its basically the same thing that happened with the 6.0 and the 6.4 ... ford demanded engines before navistar was ready to give them engines.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 09:03 PM
  #15  
DieselHardware's Avatar
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 18
From: San Dimas, CA
Default

IMO Ford has always had the better looking better built trucks. One of our company Chevy's only has 130K on it, maybe 5 years old and already has door and trim pieces falling off. Mostly highway miles too.....

I also don't expect a truck to ride like a caddy....if I wanted a caddy, I'd buy one. My truck doesn't ride all that bad, and neither does my dad's F-350 long bed for that matter. They ride really great when loaded. Put 1k in the bed of my truck and they ride like a dream.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #16  
redneckbuckeye's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 75
From: Sheridan,IN
Default

Originally Posted by kbailey
Isn't Navistar buying CAT's over the road engine division??? After ford falls on it's face with this engine and they go crawling back to navistar it is conceivable that you could find a yellow engine under the hood .. or at least a yellow engine painted like a navistar.
From what they have told us it will be a joint effort between CAT and Navastar, don't know the details as we do not build the over the road engines.


Oh and by the way that new ford is ugly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #17  
slowtowpig's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 87
From: TexaS
Default

wat ever happens, happens. i like all diesels.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #18  
AF1CUMMINS's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 54
From: Sumter, SC
Default

Originally Posted by DieselHardware
IMO Ford has always had the better looking better built trucks. One of our company Chevy's only has 130K on it, maybe 5 years old and already has door and trim pieces falling off. Mostly highway miles too.....

I also don't expect a truck to ride like a caddy....if I wanted a caddy, I'd buy one. My truck doesn't ride all that bad, and neither does my dad's F-350 long bed for that matter. They ride really great when loaded. Put 1k in the bed of my truck and they ride like a dream.

I totally agree with you. That's why I said if Ford were to put an inline six turbo diesel I'd come back tomorrow. LOL, I miss em so much I'm seriously considering getting a late 90s early 2000s model and doin a Cummins swap. The Cat C7 would be ideal but I'd have enough of a hard time affording the buying of the truck, motor and all related swap pieces to do a Cummins.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #19  
E2theRock2's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 95
From: BFE
Default

Its gonna be interesting to see what happens a little farther down the road. Fords are alright in my opinion, they have never really worked super well out on the ranch for us but I still hope this works out for them. Good luck to Ford.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #20  
YMMOT's Avatar
Diesel Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 133
Likes: 56
Default

Somebody forgot to tell all those diesel trians that the inline diesels were better than a V Configuration. They also forgot to tell all of the super dump trucks, too.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.