Reasons Why
#11
#12
Silver Bullet, 200hp injectors, Edge Comp, Dynojet 224 - 453hp. Notice how the other truck, even with the larger turbocharger doesn't drown the engine? Yet the hp numbers are very similiar on a similiar dyno? Should tell you that there is a lot left on the table, but with poor advice comes poor results.
YouTube - powermad2001's Channel
YouTube - powermad2001's Channel
Last edited by Smokem; 10-27-2009 at 07:43 AM.
#13
Whats the point here? Is someone mad cause there truck didnt make the HP they thought it would? Ive seen some crazy numbers on different dynos with some crazy setups.
At out Dyno Day in Blowing Rock there was a kid with a VP truck running a Holley Pump, Jammer 5's, Drag Comp and a PS64. He made 542hp if I remember correctly.
To many factors when it come to dynos.
At out Dyno Day in Blowing Rock there was a kid with a VP truck running a Holley Pump, Jammer 5's, Drag Comp and a PS64. He made 542hp if I remember correctly.
To many factors when it come to dynos.
#14
#15
luke he made 542? with a set of jammers.5s.= 150s.a phat shaft 64/71 and an edge. wow.i bet its not true, unless.. weston says it can be done. then i will beleive it luke.. i am sorry.
. .
hi luke glad to see ya.. you still got that p/m about the parts, (head studes).
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
sorry paul. us ignerant people wouldnt know.. or they would have told you by now.
. .
hi luke glad to see ya.. you still got that p/m about the parts, (head studes).
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
sorry paul. us ignerant people wouldnt know.. or they would have told you by now.
Last edited by oklahoma_6speed; 10-27-2009 at 01:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#16
The following users liked this post:
BlackDodge (10-27-2009)
#17
Let's ask Curtis why the SO can create more power than the HO VP44? Since he claims to be the all knowing, all seeing VP God. So go ahead Curtis, feel free to fill us all in.
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
Hey Curtis, a Phat Shaft 64 has the 65/74mm turbine, not the 71/80mm, .
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
luke he made 542? with a set of jammers.5s.= 150s.a phat shaft 64/71 and an edge. wow.i bet its not true, unless.. weston says it can be done. then i will beleive it luke.. i am sorry.
. .
hi luke glad to see ya.. you still got that p/m about the parts, (head studes).
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
sorry paul. us ignerant people wouldnt know.. or they would have told you by now.
. .
hi luke glad to see ya.. you still got that p/m about the parts, (head studes).
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
sorry paul. us ignerant people wouldnt know.. or they would have told you by now.
Last edited by Dr. Evil; 10-28-2009 at 01:18 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#18
I built that truck, its been on 5 or 6 sets of rollers. I personally feel it's got alot to do with the 3:55's and tire size on that truck. Trust me...It did it, We've seen it 3 times on 2 dynos, mustang and dynojet. I have no way to explain what or why this truck does as well as it does. I guess a dirty injector. There's no real technical data to say it should be more or less except for other trucks making 460-500 with the same setup.
It's obvious that the truck in the video didnt load, and obviously was poorly tuned with the current setup.
And weston is right thats a 64/65 charger.
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
Also seemed like they started that run at a low rpm and speed. Who was pulling it on the dyno?
It's obvious that the truck in the video didnt load, and obviously was poorly tuned with the current setup.
And weston is right thats a 64/65 charger.
luke he made 542? with a set of jammers.5s.= 150s.a phat shaft 64/71 and an edge. wow.i bet its not true, unless.. weston says it can be done. then i will beleive it luke.. i am sorry.
. .
hi luke glad to see ya.. you still got that p/m about the parts, (head studes).
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
sorry paul. us ignerant people wouldnt know.. or they would have told you by now.
. .
hi luke glad to see ya.. you still got that p/m about the parts, (head studes).
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
sorry paul. us ignerant people wouldnt know.. or they would have told you by now.
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
Also seemed like they started that run at a low rpm and speed. Who was pulling it on the dyno?
Last edited by mysterync; 10-27-2009 at 06:46 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#19
#20