The Kubota Swap 'Hijack Me' Topic
#72
I do not have one as of yet running in a vehicle. But I will say it is all personal perspective and how much work people are willing to put into what they wish to end up with.
So by there perspective they very well maybe right. If they just put a Kubota V2203 into something without a turbo and maybe without an Inter Cooler and did not work with the governor spring along with incorrect final gearing then of course they could very well be right or even if one of those items listed were not done correctly then again they can be right.
So by there perspective they very well maybe right. If they just put a Kubota V2203 into something without a turbo and maybe without an Inter Cooler and did not work with the governor spring along with incorrect final gearing then of course they could very well be right or even if one of those items listed were not done correctly then again they can be right.
#73
I do not have one as of yet running in a vehicle. But I will say it is all personal perspective and how much work people are willing to put into what they wish to end up with.
So by there perspective they very well maybe right. If they just put a Kubota V2203 into something without a turbo and maybe without an Inter Cooler and did not work with the governor spring along with incorrect final gearing then of course they could very well be right or even if one of those items listed were not done correctly then again they can be right.
Again it is all personal perspective and personal goals and how much work you are willing to put into it to achieve those goals. Not to mention ones Goals must be reasonably obtainable.
There is no doubt that engines designed for automotive applications have a distinct advantage for the average person.
I feel my goals are pretty obtainable if I even get close to Rangmars numbers as my factory 4 cyl engine is rated at 91 HP at 4500 RPM and 118 TQ at 2500 RPM. And from the best of my recollection Rangmar got around 98 HP and 289 TQ. So I know I will not have the RPM but that is what gears are for but I will have allot more usable TQ. And that is what a Truck needs is TQ. So I feel it will not only equal my present power plant but will exceed it. Except for MPH due to gearing restraints.
So by there perspective they very well maybe right. If they just put a Kubota V2203 into something without a turbo and maybe without an Inter Cooler and did not work with the governor spring along with incorrect final gearing then of course they could very well be right or even if one of those items listed were not done correctly then again they can be right.
Again it is all personal perspective and personal goals and how much work you are willing to put into it to achieve those goals. Not to mention ones Goals must be reasonably obtainable.
There is no doubt that engines designed for automotive applications have a distinct advantage for the average person.
I feel my goals are pretty obtainable if I even get close to Rangmars numbers as my factory 4 cyl engine is rated at 91 HP at 4500 RPM and 118 TQ at 2500 RPM. And from the best of my recollection Rangmar got around 98 HP and 289 TQ. So I know I will not have the RPM but that is what gears are for but I will have allot more usable TQ. And that is what a Truck needs is TQ. So I feel it will not only equal my present power plant but will exceed it. Except for MPH due to gearing restraints.
If I thought the V2203 was an inapropriate motor I would have been long gone from this site. My earlier post was just passing along information from another "expert". I want it, now I need to find the time to do it. 75 to 80 hr work weeks take there toll.
Last edited by hunk-a-junk; 03-09-2014 at 11:11 AM.
#74
New ride
The internet (which never lies) says it weighs 3488 lb.
The saga begins.
Last edited by hunk-a-junk; 03-10-2014 at 02:38 PM.
#75
Here's one for the Jeep people.
In order to turn on the tach, the PCM needs to see a signal from the cam sensor on startup. It's common for people to make or buy two sensor wheels, one for the cam and one for the crank sensor ($400+ from JD!). When I was building mine, I found that it doesn't check for accuracy of the cam sensor signal, just presence during startup. Some have used a relay to tie the disconnected cam sensor signal wire into the active crank sensor signal wire during startup, which is what I did and have used successfully for the past year and a half.
I was thinking about it last night though and couldn't see any reason why the cam sensor would need to be disconnected after starting. The actual signal from the cam sensor is used with the gas engines for checks related to fuel and ignition timing, but does not affect the gauge readout in any way after startup. It shares the same 5v power and ground output as the crank sensor, and is the same type of pickup, so there isn't any chance of overpowering and frying something.
I decided to try just directly connecting the cam signal wire to the crank sensor signal, and it worked! I managed to eliminate two fist fulls of wire, ties, and other junk in the process.
In order to turn on the tach, the PCM needs to see a signal from the cam sensor on startup. It's common for people to make or buy two sensor wheels, one for the cam and one for the crank sensor ($400+ from JD!). When I was building mine, I found that it doesn't check for accuracy of the cam sensor signal, just presence during startup. Some have used a relay to tie the disconnected cam sensor signal wire into the active crank sensor signal wire during startup, which is what I did and have used successfully for the past year and a half.
I was thinking about it last night though and couldn't see any reason why the cam sensor would need to be disconnected after starting. The actual signal from the cam sensor is used with the gas engines for checks related to fuel and ignition timing, but does not affect the gauge readout in any way after startup. It shares the same 5v power and ground output as the crank sensor, and is the same type of pickup, so there isn't any chance of overpowering and frying something.
I decided to try just directly connecting the cam signal wire to the crank sensor signal, and it worked! I managed to eliminate two fist fulls of wire, ties, and other junk in the process.
#76
Kubota decal on FleeBay
I saw this decal for sale on Flee-Bay. It is kind of cute. Check it out.
NO it is not me selling them nor do I know the seller.
Kubota Kiss This Decal Mower Tractor Pull Pulling Sticker Trailer Parts New | eBay
Should we band together and have a more tastefull one done? How about "Kubota Powered" or "Powered by Kubota"?
NO it is not me selling them nor do I know the seller.
Kubota Kiss This Decal Mower Tractor Pull Pulling Sticker Trailer Parts New | eBay
Should we band together and have a more tastefull one done? How about "Kubota Powered" or "Powered by Kubota"?
Last edited by hunk-a-junk; 03-16-2014 at 11:10 AM.
#78
does anyone have the full part # or build # for the VW K03 turbocharger? Or a picture of the complete data plate on the turbo? I wanted to try and look up the compressor map on it.
thanks
never mind I got it I think # 06A 145 713 B K03-058-EB5037706
lets see what I can find for a map
thanks
never mind I got it I think # 06A 145 713 B K03-058-EB5037706
lets see what I can find for a map
Last edited by dieselxj; 03-20-2014 at 05:32 AM.
#80
So, I'm mocking up a crude exhaust brake for my jeep. I've got the butterfly valve ready, and I'm just going to un-bolt the back 2/3 of my exhaust, and temporarily bolt the valve right up to the end of the down pipe to give it a test.
My question though, is what do I need to look out for as far as to much back pressure? Will that be something I'll be able to feel or hear when it builds up to much? Or is it something that can only be sensed with a pressure gauge? I could weld in a bung and temporarily rig up a pressure sensor?
Right now I've got two holes drilled in the butterfly valve. The valve itself is just smaller than the pipe diameter, so it wouldn't seal all the way even if there weren't holes. I figure I can enlarge the holes if needed, or weld them up and drill smaller ones if I'm not getting enough back pressure.
Any concerns here? I don't need tons of back pressure, I'm not towing a boat down a hill. Just want to keep my jeep from gaining to much speed on long hills coming down mountains without riding the brakes hard.
I'll take a photo of my setup tonight. Is there any theoretical guide or rule of thumb for how much restriction there should be?