12 Valve 2nd Gen Dodge Cummins 94-98 Discussion of 12 Valve 5.9 Liter Dodge Cummins Diesels with P7100 Injection Pumps

low fuel pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 04-20-2014, 09:56 AM
mysterync's Avatar
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Blowing Rock,NC
Posts: 3,791
Received 367 Likes on 251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JBearSVT
Yes. Very big. My point (and I'm pulling this statistic straight out of my *** here) is that probably 90% of the 12V's on the road, running 60psi is as silly as a triple disc TC on a stock tranny.
I'd say more than that! Closer to 99.9%
But 30-40 is awesome.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
 
  #22  
Old 04-20-2014, 10:03 AM
JBearSVT's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Wait... so you're saying... all these guys that I meet like, almost every day, who are pushing 1000HP with stock head studs and twins, chewing up ZR1 Corvettes and spitting them out on the highway are... lying?




I'm glad we're on the same page here.

As for locking the rack (again, really whinging it on this) isn't that more or less likely to happen based on the model year p-pump in question? I'm not super clear on the differences, but I thought there was more to it than DV's.
 
  #23  
Old 04-20-2014, 10:13 AM
mysterync's Avatar
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Blowing Rock,NC
Posts: 3,791
Received 367 Likes on 251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JBearSVT
Wait... so you're saying... all these guys that I meet like, almost every day, who are pushing 1000HP with stock head studs and twins, chewing up ZR1 Corvettes and spitting them out on the highway are... lying?




I'm glad we're on the same page here.

As for locking the rack (again, really whinging it on this) isn't that more or less likely to happen based on the model year p-pump in question? I'm not super clear on the differences, but I thought there was more to it than DV's.
Oh you have those guys too!?!?!? Are they the same ones who tow 25k at 700rwhp too? Lol
His explanation was they had a pump on a puller that was running a very high fuel pressure with no return (80-100psi). Mid track the pump ran away. They then benched the pump and found the rack "hydrostaticaly" (sp?) Locked. I'm not sure how you would determine that, What it is or how high fuel pressure would relate to that.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
 
  #24  
Old 04-20-2014, 10:27 AM
94 12valve's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pylesville, Maryland
Posts: 3,504
Received 157 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mysterync
If you really crank down on it the LP will make over 80. (Don't ask me how I know ) I've never measured how much is returned but it seems like a good bit would still be returned at 35-50. Years ago I had a discussion with the guys up at enterprise and he mentioned that anything over 50 there was a chance of actually locking the rack up. I've never heard of or seen that happen but I'd rather not take that chance. The real benefit I'm guessing is fill time is reduced so all trucks benefit, big power trucks benefit more.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
It depends on how the pump is set up for how much pressure needs to be run. For the locking the rack up with more pressure I personally have never seen this happen but at a high enough pressure I can see where it may happen.

You are correct on the fill time comment making power at higher rpm will require more fuel pressure to a point. Like it has been stated in this thread most trucks will be fine with 30-40 psi of pressure .

---AutoMerged DoublePost---

Originally Posted by mysterync
Oh you have those guys too!?!?!? Are they the same ones who tow 25k at 700rwhp too? Lol
His explanation was they had a pump on a puller that was running a very high fuel pressure with no return (80-100psi). Mid track the pump ran away. They then benched the pump and found the rack "hydrostaticaly" (sp?) Locked. I'm not sure how you would determine that, What it is or how high fuel pressure would relate to that.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
That is why the rack stuck. fuel must always return to the tank, that is how the plungers and barrels stay cool and lubed.
 

Last edited by 94 12valve; 04-20-2014 at 10:27 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
  #25  
Old 04-20-2014, 10:27 AM
JBearSVT's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mysterync
Oh you have those guys too!?!?!? Are they the same ones who tow 25k at 700rwhp too? Lol
His explanation was they had a pump on a puller that was running a very high fuel pressure with no return (80-100psi). Mid track the pump ran away. They then benched the pump and found the rack "hydrostaticaly" (sp?) Locked. I'm not sure how you would determine that, What it is or how high fuel pressure would relate to that.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
I've scaled 25K with a lot less than 700HP, but that said, over 7K of it was the truck.

Regardless, my best guess of what they were trying to say is- (since hydrostatics is essentially the science of liquid pressure at rest) that they somehow determined that more fuel was crammed into the pump than the rack had travel to move out the other side.
That isn't the way I'd have put it, but I'm sure they know more about it than I do...
 
  #26  
Old 04-20-2014, 10:31 AM
mysterync's Avatar
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Blowing Rock,NC
Posts: 3,791
Received 367 Likes on 251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JBearSVT
I've scaled 25K with a lot less than 700HP, but that said, over 7K of it was the truck.

Regardless, my best guess of what they were trying to say is- (since hydrostatics is essentially the science of liquid pressure at rest) that they somehow determined that more fuel was crammed into the pump than the rack had travel to move out the other side.
That isn't the way I'd have put it, but I'm sure they know more about it than I do...
That comment I made has a back story. A diesel mechanics group on Facebook has a number of members who feel their trucks are just as reliable at 500+ plus as factory trucks and towing has no effect on reliability while towing at those power levels. On guys goal is actually to build a 12v truck to pull 25k at 700rwhp. Not saying it can't be done but it can't be reliably done.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
 
  #27  
Old 04-20-2014, 01:49 PM
JBearSVT's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Well, I know mine has nowhere near 500, never mind 700. Hell, I'd be shocked if the average working power was half that. I do think it's a whole lot more reliable towing as it sits than it ever was from the factory, but most of that's the tranny. It just so happens that a tranny like this on a factory 12V is, well... sort of stupid.
Regardless, towing is a whole other ball of wax than running down the drag strip for sure, even if your venue means running down the drag strip with a sled behind you. It seems like anyone who knows their stuff should be able to make something hold together for under a minute of abuse, whereas pulling twice your weight across the state is a little more demanding on the reliability scale than it is on the dyno.

That all being said, most of the newer trucks in our fleet claim more power right off the showroom floor than mine optimistically has turned up as it is, but they all go out to work every day, and mine has proven to be far more reliable than these "factory supertrucks", out-performing them in every way but brakes, and cheaper to fix when it hits the fan. I certainly wouldn't say they are more reliable, modded or otherwise, and mine works circles around them to boot. But I may be missing your point.
 
  #28  
Old 04-20-2014, 02:47 PM
mysterync's Avatar
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Blowing Rock,NC
Posts: 3,791
Received 367 Likes on 251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JBearSVT
Well, I know mine has nowhere near 500, never mind 700. Hell, I'd be shocked if the average working power was half that. I do think it's a whole lot more reliable towing as it sits than it ever was from the factory, but most of that's the tranny. It just so happens that a tranny like this on a factory 12V is, well... sort of stupid.
Regardless, towing is a whole other ball of wax than running down the drag strip for sure, even if your venue means running down the drag strip with a sled behind you. It seems like anyone who knows their stuff should be able to make something hold together for under a minute of abuse, whereas pulling twice your weight across the state is a little more demanding on the reliability scale than it is on the dyno.

That all being said, most of the newer trucks in our fleet claim more power right off the showroom floor than mine optimistically has turned up as it is, but they all go out to work every day, and mine has proven to be far more reliable than these "factory supertrucks", out-performing them in every way but brakes, and cheaper to fix when it hits the fan. I certainly wouldn't say they are more reliable, modded or otherwise, and mine works circles around them to boot. But I may be missing your point.
I'm saying that a truck built with 300rwhp made to make 700rwhp regardless of modification isn't going to be as all out reliable as a truck with 300rwhp. They wear quicker. Design limits if you will. If the truck was factory built with that power and torque in mind absolutely. I'm not claiming that the trucks are not reliable, just saying added power reduces reliability, pulling more weight reduces it further. Any of the older trucks are far more reliable in my opinion than the newer ones. But taking a 12v to 700rwhp and maintaining egts, driveability, and keeping it in one piece is not as easy as some will have you think.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
 
  #29  
Old 04-20-2014, 03:36 PM
4x4manonbroke's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 3,202
Received 142 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

I couldnt agree more with all of ya ....


The more HP.. the shorter the lifespan .. no matter what the case is ... gas or diesel
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dbleo351
Chevy/GMC 6.2L and 6.5L
19
11-20-2016 09:34 AM
ctjkelley
Chevy/GMC 6.2L and 6.5L
7
06-03-2015 06:01 AM
robbyS
5.9 Liter CR Dodge Cummins 03-07
3
04-16-2015 02:22 PM
moneypitk5
Chevy/GMC 6.2L and 6.5L
3
02-12-2015 11:01 AM
vfizzano
12 Valve 2nd Gen Dodge Cummins 94-98
17
10-09-2014 02:26 PM



Quick Reply: low fuel pressure



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.