Street And Track Racing Diesel Discussions of Street And Track Racing Practices , Techniques , Tips and Kill Stories PLEASE BE CIVIL
*PLEASE DO NOT POST FUTURE EVENT DISCUSSIONS IN THIS SECTION*

NHRA Shortens Racing Distance to 1,000ft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 07-31-2008, 06:42 PM
stkdram55's Avatar
BOMBARDIER
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Holland Ohio
Posts: 6,548
Received 279 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MotorOilMcCall
How did it ruin the sport? Everybody still has to run the same track, and they still have to have an amazing reaction time to be competitive, this will just throw a wrench in the races for a few weeks, with more focus on acceleration at the bottom end. You'll see 60ft and 330ft times drop guaranteed.

I would have to agree, this will not make the sport any less enjoyable for the fans or the drivers, 70% of the races the cars drop cylinders and arent at full power at 1000 ft mark anyhow so are we really missing anything?

If it was John Force there would of been alot of lookin at stuff they could change and might of even shut the series down.
 
  #12  
Old 07-31-2008, 07:19 PM
DB Admin's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Perry Co. Ohio
Posts: 29,849
Received 3,297 Likes on 1,640 Posts
Default

Should put a sand trap at the end of the track instead IMO
 
  #13  
Old 07-31-2008, 08:48 PM
Diesel-N-Dust's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 1,283
Received 58 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

So how are they going to deal w/ the records?
 
  #14  
Old 08-01-2008, 08:29 AM
MotorOilMcCall's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,202
Received 58 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

They still have a 1000ft time on record for every race going back god knows how long, the only thing they won't be able to compare to is Trap Speeds, because those only used to be measured at the 1320ft mark. Norwalk put a big net at the end of the track, but if a car is doing 300+MPH, I personally don't think its gonna make a big difference. Sand could do some nasty stuff to the driver in there anyways, and there's always the environmental whacko's who complain that its not natural in that area. Either is concrete or asphalt, but they still drive don't they?
 
  #15  
Old 08-01-2008, 08:42 AM
AF1CUMMINS's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 1,034
Received 54 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

I didn't know they had a limit on the speed of the cars. That sucks, I guess it's kinda like restrictor plates in NASCAR. I think they oughta let them boys run wide damn open to the finish line and go as fast as they can. Like yall said, they all know the risks they're takin, so if they wanna do it......hell, let em do it. HAMMER DOWN!!!!!!!!!
 
  #16  
Old 08-03-2008, 07:26 PM
01quadcab's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Shingletown ca
Posts: 2,664
Received 153 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

they will be looking to add the feet back in but they want it to be safe first. a lot of the tracks they run at don't have the space to add to the shut down area. sand works but causes a lot of roll overs as most cars are not going straight at that point. top fuel and funny car are only ones who have short track. guess it's time they step motor size down to bring speeds down till cars can be made safer
 




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.