Originally Posted by slightlyWETfart!
(Post 772989)
wonder if a retentoin holster could of saved his life?
Without knowing what caliber he was shooting we can ASSume all kinds of things that might be totally wrong...like he shot him with a 25 or 380 and was stunned that he did not fall back like in the movies...bleeding and dying... |
i'm just saying if it was in a retentoin holster it probably would of turned out quite differently. that if it was in his holster.
|
If he used a grenade it wouldn't have mattered.
|
Originally Posted by Ramprat
(Post 772998)
How??? he had already shot the guy twice...thus the gun was in his hand we can ASSume..and the guy he shot took it from him...after being shot....
Without knowing what caliber he was shooting we can ASSume all kinds of things that might be totally wrong...like he shot him with a 25 or 380, 9MM, .40, .45, 10MM, 357SIG and was stunned that he did not fall back like in the movies...bleeding and dying... No such thing as a magic one stop shot like in the movies with any cal if not put in the right spot. |
if he had chuck norris it wouldn't have mattered.:moon:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by slightlyWETfart!
(Post 773005)
i'm just saying if it was in a retentoin holster it probably would of turned out quite differently. that if it was in his holster.
Not to mention, how many people carry concealed in a retention holster... Personally for civilian use a retention holster is overkill and not needed unless you like to walk around in open crowds pretending to be joe cool policeman showing off your pistol...:pca1::pca1::pca1: ---AutoMerged DoublePost---
Originally Posted by slightlyWETfart!
(Post 773021)
if he had chuck norris it wouldn't have mattered.:moon:
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
Originally Posted by Begle1
(Post 773016)
If he used a grenade it wouldn't have mattered.
|
Close Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades
That's the thing with the anti's - they don't appreciate the subtle differences between things like spitwads, handguns, grenades and nuclear warheads.
They are all weapons = BAD. :scare2: |
If You Shoot Somebody...Don't Do This...
The worst part it this whole ordeal sounds like it started cause the guy that ended up dying got his underwear wadded up his crack to much.
|
Originally Posted by NadirPoint
(Post 773028)
That's the thing with the anti's - they don't appreciate the subtle differences between things like spitwads, handguns, grenades and nuclear warheads.
If they're far away, use gun. If they're close, use grenade. |
[QUOTE=Ramprat;773022]How do you shoot somebody when your pistol is in a retention holster????
Not to mention, how many people carry concealed in a retention holster... Personally for civilian use a retention holster is overkill and not needed unless you like to walk around in open crowds pretending to be joe cool policeman showing off your pistol...:pca1::pca1::pca1: ---AutoMerged DoublePost--- Somebody's been gulping jungle juice again...:s::s::s::s::s: ---AutoMerged DoublePost--- well in my opinion a retentoin holster is better and is not overkill and is practical and might of saved this guys life. the :edit: you got to say to that? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands