yeah me too it looks just as stupid as duel stacks on a pickup. Of course the big tires do have a purpose on a truck that need to have a wide foot print on the snow. haven't figured a use for stacks yet unless it is to compensate for a lack of something else

 

Heck of a lot more practical then that damn "Predator" truck, or ANY H2 or H3 "truck" out there. I agree they are rather wide, but it could have its advantages. If it every left the pavement!

 

I would love to be rolling around that beast

 

Here are some pictures of two other similar H1's from Iceland...






---AutoMerged DoublePost---

And if anyone wants to buy the truck on the first picture:
bilasolur.is

 

They do look too wide, and too big too, that cant have much suspension travel... I could see that being great for snow or ice, but since Im in Texas......

 

Looks good! What is the overall width with those things?

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

 

Kinda funny looking at some of the comments on a purpose built rig. Yup it has wide tires and very limited suspension travel. Where they wheel, they are looking to stay on top of the snow and ice, and I dare bet that suspension travel is a moot point when dealing with flat tundra type landscape. People think my rig is ridiculous, no doors, no glass, full cage, 4 point harness's, stock width XJ axles, and 37" tall tires, and not a straight body panel on it.............but then again I play in rocks, and tight technical trails....................that being said, I would rock the H1 in the snow as it sits

 

How do you like the GLACIER Suburban me and dad are building:


Dana 80 rear, with Detroit TrueTrac locker...

Dana 60 front, with an open diff, will probably swap for TrueTrac too...