Ford Powerstroke 94-98 7.3L Discussion of 94-98 7.3 Liter Ford Powerstroke Turbo Diesels

stacks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 11-04-2011, 10:29 PM
fordornothing's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 3,884
Received 144 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

the only thing i noticed with my stack was my right foot got heavier. which could mean higer EGT's
 
  #22  
Old 11-04-2011, 11:14 PM
85_305's Avatar
Being Evaluated
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,905
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fordornothing
when i had a stack on my 94. it sounded totally different than the under body. but it will. any difference in mpg, no. power, no. did anything change other than sound, no. maybe you just think it did because it sounded different and you were coasting down more hills...
It wasn't me, but the one guy on the org, 351fifty, can tell you exactly his egt's w/ straight back exhaust and stacks. Take it up with him, not me.

Originally Posted by 95powersmoker
Explain to me how it can change the temp at the manifold a few hundred degrees please. Also explain how you mpg's will increase enough to calculate. Oh right.... If it's posted on the org it must be true... And again for hp, an exhaust might get you 10... Maybe...
Because there is less backpressure and more area for heat dissipation would be my guess.

As far as the exhaust only being 10hp, I call bs. There are systems by 42dd for Audi's (a 1.8 liter gasser, mind you) that are good for 30hp... you mean to tell me a 7.3 liter diesel is only getting 10 measly *** hp out of a larger, more free flowing exhaust setup? What kind of mileage does your truck get in city and highway driving? Maybe mixed driving?
 
  #23  
Old 11-04-2011, 11:34 PM
fordornothing's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 3,884
Received 144 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

when i first bought it, it was bone stock. i was getting about 16 mixed driving. now i'm still getting about 16 with the mods in my sig. but it runs a hell of alot better. the heat dicipation, it's 8 feet away from the manifold......
 
  #24  
Old 11-05-2011, 03:20 AM
95powersmoker's Avatar
BOMBARDIER
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 2,959
Received 187 Likes on 161 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 85_305
It wasn't me, but the one guy on the org, 351fifty, can tell you exactly his egt's w/ straight back exhaust and stacks. Take it up with him, not me.



Because there is less backpressure and more area for heat dissipation would be my guess.

As far as the exhaust only being 10hp, I call bs. There are systems by 42dd for Audi's (a 1.8 liter gasser, mind you) that are good for 30hp... you mean to tell me a 7.3 liter diesel is only getting 10 measly *** hp out of a larger, more free flowing exhaust setup? What kind of mileage does your truck get in city and highway driving? Maybe mixed driving?
Yes I mean to tell you that you are not getting more than ten horsepower out of an exhaust...

I get 16-20. You can not and should not compare what an Audi get's with an exhaust to what a Powerstroke Diesel gets... And to clear up an misunderstandings, the turbo creates all the backpressure your engine needs, therefore your hypothesis needs some work. Also, I don't care to take it up with mr. org, you can believe everything he tells you but I won't. I didn't change MPG when going from stock exhaust to 3" dp with 4" dual exhaust... I wonder if mr. org thinks dual exhaust would drop the egt's 2x the amount because there is 2x the exits....
 
  #25  
Old 11-05-2011, 11:30 AM
85_305's Avatar
Being Evaluated
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,905
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fordornothing
when i first bought it, it was bone stock. i was getting about 16 mixed driving. now i'm still getting about 16 with the mods in my sig. but it runs a hell of alot better. the heat dicipation, it's 8 feet away from the manifold......
As far as being 8ft away from the manifold.. it's called a heat sync. The length and diameter of the pipe relays the heat further and further out until it dies out.

Originally Posted by 95powersmoker
Yes I mean to tell you that you are not getting more than ten horsepower out of an exhaust...

I get 16-20. You can not and should not compare what an Audi get's with an exhaust to what a Powerstroke Diesel gets... And to clear up an misunderstandings, the turbo creates all the backpressure your engine needs, therefore your hypothesis needs some work. Also, I don't care to take it up with mr. org, you can believe everything he tells you but I won't. I didn't change MPG when going from stock exhaust to 3" dp with 4" dual exhaust... I wonder if mr. org thinks dual exhaust would drop the egt's 2x the amount because there is 2x the exits....
I call bs on a full exhaust only giving 10hp on a 7.3psd. I understand comparing 2 different types of motors and manufacturers is rather silly, nut the point is if a 1.8liter turbo motor can pick up 30hp with an exhaust larger than a stock powerstrokes, that a powerstroke wont gain any hp ditching the same size piping that a 4banger has on it?! Thats ignorant.

351fifty on the org has verified per his pyro the egt drop.. it's not being pulled out of anybodies ***.
 
  #26  
Old 11-05-2011, 12:27 PM
95powersmoker's Avatar
BOMBARDIER
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 2,959
Received 187 Likes on 161 Posts
Default

Ya, When I built my dual exhaust, I was really hoping to get 2x the power of regular straight pipe cuz I had two exits. I surely thought that was going to do it. Also was hoping to gain 6mpg's over the standard 3 that most people get with straight pipe...

Oh, checked out your Org buddy's post... Looks like he had his pyro in the downpipe... Also came across a post over there by a vendor that said "the stacks look and sound better but wont give you any more hp or egt drops than running a straight piped 4" kit"... Now, don't you think if they actually did do those things, He would be telling everybody so he can sell more of them...

Intake and Exhaust are important, but I just don't see them as that important to worry over a few hp gains... You won't notice it. The truck will sound better, that's about it. If you truly think you gained 30hp with your stacks and picked up mpg's, great, but I don't believe everything I read on the box my intake and exhaust came in. And I certainly don't believe a guy that dropped 300* with stacks with his pyro in his downpipe...

The gain from an exhaust comes in that you are removing the flat downpipe and possibly getting rid of a clogged catalytic converter...A 4" exhaust is not that much bigger than your 3.5" factory exhaust and your factory muffler is perfectly fine to run power through.

I gained no noticeable hp from an exhaust and intake, and my mpg's did not change enough to credit them with gaining any fuel efficiency.
 
  #27  
Old 11-05-2011, 01:16 PM
fordornothing's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 3,884
Received 144 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

well if the pyro probe is in the DP, it's probably showing cooler. i wonder why... oh that's right, it's not accurite. it can very a few hundred degrees up or down.
 
  #28  
Old 11-05-2011, 02:41 PM
joebob3093's Avatar
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Powell Butte, OR
Posts: 2,558
Received 138 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

When I straight piped mine it had better throttle response and was maybe a hair quicker but im not going to say it gave me 10+hp more. I changed 0 on my mpg. You are taking what you read as the truth.
 
  #29  
Old 11-05-2011, 08:19 PM
85_305's Avatar
Being Evaluated
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,905
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95powersmoker
Ya, When I built my dual exhaust, I was really hoping to get 2x the power of regular straight pipe cuz I had two exits. I surely thought that was going to do it. Also was hoping to gain 6mpg's over the standard 3 that most people get with straight pipe...

Oh, checked out your Org buddy's post... Looks like he had his pyro in the downpipe... Also came across a post over there by a vendor that said "the stacks look and sound better but wont give you any more hp or egt drops than running a straight piped 4" kit"... Now, don't you think if they actually did do those things, He would be telling everybody so he can sell more of them...

Intake and Exhaust are important, but I just don't see them as that important to worry over a few hp gains... You won't notice it. The truck will sound better, that's about it. If you truly think you gained 30hp with your stacks and picked up mpg's, great, but I don't believe everything I read on the box my intake and exhaust came in. And I certainly don't believe a guy that dropped 300* with stacks with his pyro in his downpipe...

The gain from an exhaust comes in that you are removing the flat downpipe and possibly getting rid of a clogged catalytic converter...A 4" exhaust is not that much bigger than your 3.5" factory exhaust and your factory muffler is perfectly fine to run power through.

I gained no noticeable hp from an exhaust and intake, and my mpg's did not change enough to credit them with gaining any fuel efficiency.
I gained a seat of the pants performance increase as well as better mileage from installing my 5" exhaust and 3" dp fyi.

Originally Posted by joebob3093
When I straight piped mine it had better throttle response and was maybe a hair quicker but im not going to say it gave me 10+hp more. I changed 0 on my mpg. You are taking what you read as the truth.
I'm not taking what I read as the truth.. I"m taking my experience of owning 39 cars as truth.
 
  #30  
Old 11-05-2011, 09:15 PM
fordornothing's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 3,884
Received 144 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

39 CARS or POWERSTROKES' i've owned 3 powerstrokes. 2 OBS, 1 SD. not a dam bit of mileage or performance gains with exhaust, stacks OR out the back.
 


Quick Reply: stacks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.