Intercooler V. water injection?
#1
#2
#4
#6
Obviously, you should go with the intercooler first and he has as much as said so.
I personally do not know the answer... but I'd like to.
#7
#9
You absolutely did not. If there had been a period following the word "Intercooler" with out the irrelivant explanation, then it would have been an answer.
He wants to know which will cool more. Obviously, the water/ meth would have to be turned on during the comparison. As far as that goes, it would have to have water/meth in the system. Maybe we should also stipulate that the water/meth has to be injected into the intake as apposed to the fuel tank, or the atmosphere, or the shock absorbers.
Your answer, says an intercooler is better because it doesn't require water/meth all the time. I will agree with this statement, but it did not answer the question as posed. The question is which would be better at lowering egt's. (lowest temperature wins)
He wants to know which will cool more. Obviously, the water/ meth would have to be turned on during the comparison. As far as that goes, it would have to have water/meth in the system. Maybe we should also stipulate that the water/meth has to be injected into the intake as apposed to the fuel tank, or the atmosphere, or the shock absorbers.
Your answer, says an intercooler is better because it doesn't require water/meth all the time. I will agree with this statement, but it did not answer the question as posed. The question is which would be better at lowering egt's. (lowest temperature wins)
#10