2010 Duramax 6.9
Just read in Diesel power that their sources tell them that in 2010 the duramax will have 425Hp and 750ftlb fom the factory and will be 6.9 litre. I wonder what they could get out of these new trucks without all the bull shit emisions crap.
|
Also, the Allison is going to be redesigned and the current rumor mill is saying an 8 speed. :up2:
|
Originally Posted by redneckbuckeye
(Post 207428)
I wonder what they could get out of these new trucks without all the bull shit emisions crap.
|
I may have to look into trading in, after they come out with delete kits for all the emisions.
|
Is it going to be a new engine or are they just increasing the displacement? 8 speed that will be cool
|
1000 HP + 8 Speed Allison = YEEEE HAW!
:choochoo::choochoo: Wheres that Black Smoke Smiley? lol |
Originally Posted by Oilfield_Mafia
(Post 207526)
1000 HP + 8 Speed Allison = YEEEE HAW!
:choochoo::choochoo: Wheres that Black Smoke Smiley? lol |
:lol88:
|
I'll believe it when I see it... With the Emissions stuff going on them, I don't see them making that much more HP/TQ and still being able to meet EPA requirements, but what do I know.
|
Originally Posted by trashygasman
(Post 207551)
You definitely don't need that:jail:
|
Originally Posted by MotorOilMcCall
(Post 207571)
I'll believe it when I see it... With the Emissions stuff going on them, I don't see them making that much more HP/TQ and still being able to meet EPA requirements, but what do I know.
|
u can probably get retrofit some pre-emmison stuff on they 6.9L
maybe. But man can u imagine a stock sc/lb truck with 425hp |
Originally Posted by DangerousDuramax
(Post 207579)
Interesting...they already met the 2010 emissions and still made almost 500hp. Google is your friend. Give it a try. :up2:
|
We're not talking about the CURRENT production DMAX. The prototypes they were testing met the 2010 requirements as well as produced over 450 hp, hence the 425hp for the production units in '10. Go do your homework, I'm not going to do it for you. BTW- making 550hp in a DMAX is quite easy. Especially since it was designed that way to begin with. Pro Mod parts and technology go a long way. :rolleyes2:
|
what i hear is that the 5.9 couldn't meet emissions either, so thats why they did away with it:w2:
|
Originally Posted by 2500HeavyDuty
(Post 207716)
what i hear is that the 5.9 couldn't meet emissions either, so thats why they did away with it:w2:
As far as the new 6.9L goes, it makes 425HP at this point, and its not even out yet, so why are you bench racing it already? You have another 6-10 months before this thing hits showroom floors. It could be tuned to 390HP by then, or lower, or higher. I know what they produced in testing, I wasn't asking you to give me answers. But the 2010 Engine isn't Stock yet is it, hence the term "Prototype." I either misunderstood what you were saying, or we both misunderstood each other. As far as Pro-Mod parts and technology goes, I don't understand why you even said this. Pro-Mod parts? If they are stock, they aren't "Pro-Mod". They may have been 5 years ago, but thats the point of racing, to develop better parts for the OEM. Formula 1, Le Mans, Indy, they all work this way, and the diesel world is no different. Technology is right about equal between all 3 engine manufacturers, but do you really think pumping computers into engines is a good thing? I sure as hell don't. There is no question the tried and true 12V is the king of reliability, and can produce the most horsepower out of any of the engines when built to the hilt. It does it without a computer, granted its not often streetable power, but either are most 1000HP+ D-Max's or CR Dodges running numerous computer programs and dozens of sensors. In either case, the world of great diesel engines is here to stay, at least for the next few decades, lets celebrate :c:. |
I'm not even going to justify that with an answer. :rolleyes2:
|
Originally Posted by DangerousDuramax
(Post 207723)
I'm not even going to justify that with an answer. :rolleyes2:
|
Who said that the 1000+ HP Dmax's werent Streetable? Keith Drives Nasty girl back and forth to work, Also, I believe that Twin SC DMAX is making over 1000 HP and is very much a daily driver..
|
[QUOTE=MotorOilMcCall;207722]Exactly, except Cummins passed 2010 tests in 2007, meanwhile Izusu and Navistar waited until the last minute (so to speak) to come out with a production engine that can handle it.
As far as the new 6.9L goes, it makes 425HP at this point, and its not even out yet, so why are you bench racing it already? You have another 6-10 months before this thing hits showroom floors. It could be tuned to 390HP by then, or lower, or higher. I know what they produced in testing, I wasn't asking you to give me answers. But the 2010 Engine isn't Stock yet is it, hence the term "Prototype." I either misunderstood what you were saying, or we both misunderstood each other. As far as Pro-Mod parts and technology goes, I don't understand why you even said this. Pro-Mod parts? If they are stock, they aren't "Pro-Mod". They may have been 5 years ago, but thats the point of racing, to develop better parts for the OEM. Formula 1, Le Mans, Indy, they all work this way, and the diesel world is no different. Technology is right about equal between all 3 engine manufacturers, but do you really think pumping computers into engines is a good thing? I sure as hell don't. There is no question the tried and true 12V is the king of reliability, and can produce the most horsepower out of any of the engines when built to the hilt. It does it without a computer, granted its not often streetable power, but either are most 1000HP+ D-Max's or CR Dodges running numerous computer programs and dozens of sensors. In either case, the world of great diesel engines is here to stay, at least for the next few decades, lets celebrate :c:.[/ Isuzu ? where did you get that, isuzu had nothing to do with the LMM. Gm owns 100% of Dmax . Isuzu and GM worked together to come up with the initial deign of the first dmax, it was a joint effort.Isuzu is not involved ,or has no ownership in DMAX. |
Exactly...DMAX Limited. :ok1:
|
:pca1::pca1: Are they putting that Urea crap on it or the DPF junk they are using now? Did they mention anything about the emissions controls, and what they are doing to make it more fuel efficient??:humm:
|
Originally Posted by stkdram55
(Post 207881)
:pca1::pca1: Are they putting that Urea crap on it or the DPF junk they are using now? Did they mention anything about the emissions controls, and what they are doing to make it more fuel efficient??:humm:
|
Originally Posted by trashygasman
(Post 207551)
You definitely don't need that:jail:
No one needs anything, but we all want somthing and 1000hp+8 speed=tons of fun...:rocking: |
Originally Posted by Nemo
(Post 207922)
No one needs anything, but we all want somthing and 1000hp+8 speed=tons of fun...:rocking:
|
i think its going to be with the urea injection and the DPF
|
I'll clear this up for everyone right now.
I am a GM tech and for the longest time I too thought that Izuzu was making the Duramax motor. I was sent off for training in late July and came back with a whole new perspective. Izuzu DID help design the intial prototype motor that was NOT the 6.6, instead it was a 7.0 Duramax but had the same basic design. After many different tests and real life test models GM decided to make it smaller for fuel efficnecy and in doing so they also increased the hp and tq on the 6.6 so that it was more than the 7.0. Izuzu agian helped design the 6.6 but they never ever ever built a single one. ALL DURAMAX MOTORS WERE BUILT BY GM!!!! At training I did see the first Duramax 7.0L and it was a beast, it didnt make much power but it had potencial. Also while i was down there they rolled in a 6.9L twin turbo 6 speed Allison Duramax and let us peak around. I cannot tell you for sure if its going to be twined of large single turbo thats beyond the info that i have right now. Hope that clears things up for you guys. |
Thanks Eric.
:c: |
Originally Posted by E2theRock2
(Post 210867)
I'll clear this up for everyone right now.
I am a GM tech and for the longest time I too thought that Izuzu was making the Duramax motor. I was sent off for training in late July and came back with a whole new perspective. Izuzu DID help design the intial prototype motor that was NOT the 6.6, instead it was a 7.0 Duramax but had the same basic design. After many different tests and real life test models GM decided to make it smaller for fuel efficnecy and in doing so they also increased the hp and tq on the 6.6 so that it was more than the 7.0. Izuzu agian helped design the 6.6 but they never ever ever built a single one. ALL DURAMAX MOTORS WERE BUILT BY GM!!!! At training I did see the first Duramax 7.0L and it was a beast, it didnt make much power but it had potencial. Also while i was down there they rolled in a 6.9L twin turbo 6 speed Allison Duramax and let us peak around. I cannot tell you for sure if its going to be twined of large single turbo thats beyond the info that i have right now. Hope that clears things up for you guys. |
I'm not gonna brand bash, what I am going to say is that I love diesels and I think all big 3 are good trucks and they have there ups and downs. I personally like the Cummins the most and then the Duramax and then Powerstroke. Just my opinion.
Now for the sake of my job i cant tell you all the details of the 2010 Duramax because it is not out yet and because I dont know too much about it because GM is hiding that stuff even from its techs. When I am trained on it I will give you the full scoop inside and out of the truck. I have seen the prototype first hand and it was a urea injection twin turbo dpf egr machine. The engineers said that it would exceed the 2010 emissions requirments and produce more power then the rivals. Now thats what they said so dont kill the messenger. None of us got to drive the truck but the engineers did and it almost sounded like a 7.3 just quieter. Should be interesting, I'll keep you guys posted as i learn more. |
I was not intending to brand bash either, I was simply trying to make the point that when I hear the dmax is an Isuzu motor it si usually from a Cummins or powerstroke owner, and I think they are all good trucks, just small things that make me a GM person and another a Dodge or Ford.
|
they are making it harder for me to keep saying that i am not going to buy new if they make that engine have that much power right out of the box
|
The thing is, is that manufactures are getting smart, they know that people want to do preformance mods and not just looks so they are programming the trucks right out of the box to not except programs very well. GM especially is getting smart with this by running two ecms on prototype vehicles to see if they can void an engine programmer out. The reason why they do this is because it costs them money because people try to fudge a warrenty. To me if you modify prefromance wise get ready to pay the price for what you have done. If you want your warrenty but more power then you are gonna have to pick your battle and choose one. I havent heard anything from Crysler or Ford about any new 2010 developments but all the manufactures are cracking down the same way.
|
ya i can understand that and yes i have tried to get my truck covered under warranty before for some performance thing but i am not one of those that fights with them about it hey i may get lucky and they will cover it or i may not and i will have to pay for it i understand that
|
E2theRock2...
do you know if GM is coming out with a 4500 chassis like Dodge Ram's 4500? What sort of torque do you think the new 2010 engine will put out? thanks |
Originally Posted by losman54
(Post 216756)
E2theRock2...
do you know if GM is coming out with a 4500 chassis like Dodge Ram's 4500? What sort of torque do you think the new 2010 engine will put out? thanks |
E2.... you're the only one who has been able to somewhat authenticate anything regarding GM's 2010 future engine. When do you think that GM will start officially talking about this engine?new truck? Knowing that GM will have a 4.5L for their 1500 series truck there is no doubt that GM has to push the spec for their 3500 series trucks beyond 2009's specs.
|
Originally Posted by MotorOilMcCall
(Post 207683)
lol... 500 HP stock? Show me where... And the Current Duramax DIDN'T meet 2010 EPA standards, thats why they had to come out with a new version. The only engine that met the standard was the 6.7L Cummins.
|
Regardless, no matter what engine its on, the new EPA equipment limits HP numbers, sure, they'll find ways to deal with it, but its not adding HP by any means.
|
Originally Posted by MotorOilMcCall
(Post 251575)
Regardless, no matter what engine its on, the new EPA equipment limits HP numbers, sure, they'll find ways to deal with it, but its not adding HP by any means.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands