What do you guys think about this gun ??
#12
---AutoMerged DoublePost---
THE ONLY THING I DON'T LIKE ABOUT THIS GUN, IS YOU NEED A CLASS 2 OR 3 LICENSE !!
Last edited by gunman41mag; 01-27-2009 at 09:12 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#13
Thats what sucks about a SBR (short barreled rifle)... I didn't notice is it full auto?
Either way you gotta figure its at least a $200 tax stamp. There was some guy who made a deployable stock that fit a glock, but it required a $200 tax stamp because it made the pistol into a SBR. So for a $50 accessory (which is kinda pointless if you ask me), you had to pay for a $200 tax stamp to use it. Of course, thats only if you report it to uncle sam.
Either way you gotta figure its at least a $200 tax stamp. There was some guy who made a deployable stock that fit a glock, but it required a $200 tax stamp because it made the pistol into a SBR. So for a $50 accessory (which is kinda pointless if you ask me), you had to pay for a $200 tax stamp to use it. Of course, thats only if you report it to uncle sam.
#14
#15
#16
Doubt it... its hard to modify a piston to accept rifle ammo, and by hard, I mean close to impossible. They just want your money, like everything else. Its funny, people can do more damage from afar with a Rem 700, yet when a weapons ban comes out, its always aimed at evil looking guns that are generally not accurate. I don't understand the point of it.
#17
Doubt it... its hard to modify a piston to accept rifle ammo, and by hard, I mean close to impossible. They just want your money, like everything else. Its funny, people can do more damage from afar with a Rem 700, yet when a weapons ban comes out, its always aimed at evil looking guns that are generally not accurate. I don't understand the point of it.
#18
#20