Proven BOMB Combinations
Diesel Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 408
Likes: 31
I hope to get around that mark when my build is over, well without the giggle.
oh and the post idea is pretty good in my opinion
it was actual hp
nah i am downgrading that power is way to unmanagable on the street i am going to drop my injector size and go to a set of compounds
5x14 inj
60/14 secondary
76/14 primary compound setup
500hp set up now thats more managable
before you ask why is becuase try driving vehicle on slick ice all the time it sux
5x14 inj
60/14 secondary
76/14 primary compound setup
500hp set up now thats more managable
before you ask why is becuase try driving vehicle on slick ice all the time it sux
Diesel Bomber
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 157
From: Pylesville, Maryland
I think is a good idea but I think Smokem is saying don't get all pissy if you don't get those same numbers. I am not a big dyno guy....to many variables and to many different dynos. IMO you are better off to weight the truck and run it at the track and get a time slip. There are fewer inconsistencies with power numbers then.
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 391
Likes: 46
From: Iowa
Any dyno using a load will not be consistant. If you want even numbers, heavy wheel inertia is the only way to go. I have seen people claim hp numbers from a load dyno that are rediculous, I guess the torque curve still climbing past 2500RPM didn't clue anyone in.
also if you have a 4x4 you can trick a dyno by putting it in 4 wheel low with the front driveshaft out want to talk about numbers being high
Diesel Bombers Sponsor
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 391
Likes: 46
From: Iowa
The point is you will never have a standard result without a standard measure, there are just too many variables. People with experience in what works and what doesn't are the best bet to reaching any one goal as far as hp is concerned.
