1st Generation Dodge Cummins 89-93 Discussion of 12 Valve 5.9 Liter Dodge Cummins Diesels with Rotary Injection Pumps

Fuel Pin Videos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #11  
muskrat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Diesel Wrench
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 538
Likes: 39
From: Bitterroot Valley Mt
Default

Your BD pin is essentialy the same as the M5 pin. So, looking at all those videos as a test - a mostly stock truck, no variables, the same dyno, just a swap of fuel pins, it shows that the M3 pin makes the most power, period. As the profile gets more agressive, the less efficient it becomes, because the rack is basicly just dropping into the fullest fueling point(the deepest part of the pin), dumping fuel in that won't burn (because of low boost), rather than moving in a more efficient path. Utilizing more burnt fuel versus sending unburnt fuel out the pipes. Thats how I'm seeing it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #12  
tower_ofpower's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 86
From: Kingwood, WV
Default

stock numbers have gotta be off... i thought these old girls came with roughly 185 horse to start with?
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #13  
muskrat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Diesel Wrench
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 538
Likes: 39
From: Bitterroot Valley Mt
Default

Originally Posted by tower_ofpower
stock numbers have gotta be off... i thought these old girls came with roughly 185 horse to start with?
Yep, it has to be a misprint. They should be around 160 hp. My 85 4runner has more than hp than what the first vid shows
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #14  
Richie O's Avatar
Diesel Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 267
Likes: 17
From: New England
Default

A stock cooled truck with a rag should be upper 140's lower 150's. A stock non cooled truck with a rag should be maybe 5 hp above that.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #15  
seandonato73's Avatar
Diesel Wrench
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 603
Likes: 9
From: lebanon, Pa
Default

yeah a little confused of the first dyno run hp and tq, i know my truck was gutless stock,but cummins is normally close to the hp they say the engine is rated at, i think my buddies 4 banger jeep has more then 78hp
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #16  
RSWORDS's Avatar
BOMBARDIER

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,159
Likes: 918
From: Gloucester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Richie O
A stock cooled truck with a rag should be upper 140's lower 150's. A stock non cooled truck with a rag should be maybe 5 hp above that.
I've heard of bone stock tucks putting down 160hp at the wheels, the numbers in teh stock video have to be wrong.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 06:52 PM
  #17  
Richie O's Avatar
Diesel Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 267
Likes: 17
From: New England
Default

I saw a 90 non cooled truck put down 166 but he had turned the fuel cone to deepest. Rest was stock.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 07:07 PM
  #18  
FRadisi's Avatar
Diesel Fan
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 1
From: Cypress, TX
Default

That low hp stock doesn't seem right to me...
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 08:13 PM
  #19  
DieselPerformanceGuy's Avatar
Diesel Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 301
Likes: 2
From: eastern wyoming
Default

and the torque is way to low 140 ft lbs of torque and they're rated at 400 ft lbs. Somethings not right.

---AutoMerged DoublePost---

Originally Posted by muskrat
Your BD pin is essentialy the same as the M5 pin. So, looking at all those videos as a test - a mostly stock truck, no variables, the same dyno, just a swap of fuel pins, it shows that the M3 pin makes the most power, period. As the profile gets more agressive, the less efficient it becomes, because the rack is basicly just dropping into the fullest fueling point(the deepest part of the pin), dumping fuel in that won't burn (because of low boost), rather than moving in a more efficient path. Utilizing more burnt fuel versus sending unburnt fuel out the pipes. Thats how I'm seeing it.
Yea thats true, but i still think i'm going with the m3 pin and will give my PA the BD.
 

Last edited by DieselPerformanceGuy; Nov 29, 2009 at 08:14 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 10:32 AM
  #20  
Alwaysworking's Avatar
Diesel Fan
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 6
From: keizer Oregon
Default

The numbers on the videos are what came up for the dyno pulls, the guy running the dyno didn't think they should be so low but, we ran the dyno the same for the white truck and it made good power.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.