Originally Posted by dieseljunkie
(Post 35882)
I have a question.. does ANYONE make a 315/70/17 or 35x12.50x17 in a load range E?
Scott |
Awesome bro! I can't afford the toyo MT's I don't think, but the Hankook I can.
Scott »»»»»»»»»»»«««««««««««« AutoMerged DoublePost »»»»»»»»»»»«««««««««««« I take that back... The hankook MT's are only $10 less per tire than the toyo MT.... For that price difference, I would rather just go with the toyo MT. Scott |
yea, hankooks were cheaper but have increased in price lately. go with the toyos, i've heard lots of good. hankooks seem to be a hit and miss
|
My dad had the Hankook ATS or something like that on his 04.5 3500 dually, and they lasted about 25k highway miles. He wasn't too happy with em.
Scott |
I'll be putting Toyo's on after these BFG's wear out. I get better pricing on Toyo tires than I do on BFGs. Besides, Toyo builds a darned nice tire.
|
I have had my Toyo's, 315 x 70 x 17, E load range on for 11k now and still have tread left (maybe 15% gone). I do know that doing burnouts with them eats them up a lot faster then a A/T type of tire. You can tell by the marks they leave on the road. A/T will leave plenty of rubber but you can see the tread spaces on the road between the rubber whereas the Toyo's M/T just leave DARK BLACK MARKS on the road and no spacing between the treads. Back mudflap also has a lot more rubber on it compared to A/T tires. Harder to spin also, but truck still does it. :up:
|
Originally Posted by Whitmore
(Post 35904)
my tires load range H rated for 6400 lbs.........twice of what a 16" tire can offer.....oh and I have over 100k on them right now!!!!!!!!
|
nitto makes the mud grappler in a 35x12.50R17 load range E
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands