Originally Posted by CSIPSD
(Post 73643)
Because you were infering that International had something to do with it...
The EPA made the 7.3 go away... not that it was not a dead motor at that time anyway compared to the duramax and CR 5.9s that were coming out then... Regardless of why International chose to eliminate the T444E design platform, the facts are that International pulled the plug. Saying "that's just wrong" makes no sense... |
You know the 7.3l could have been made to meet the emission standards just fine. A 32 valve head, common rail fuel sys, EGR and the twin chargers that on the 6.4 and good tuning. Just look at the trend of new engines, 5.9-6.7 6.6-6.9 maybe and the 6.4 to a new 6.7. As the saying goes, there is no subsitute for CI.
A 7.3l can make over a 1000hp, Its not a heui but a full mech version. |
Originally Posted by Diesel Nut
(Post 84447)
You know the 7.3l could have been made to meet the emission standards just fine. A 32 valve head, common rail fuel sys, EGR and the twin chargers that on the 6.4 and good tuning. Just look at the trend of new engines, 5.9-6.7 6.6-6.9 maybe and the 6.4 to a new 6.7. As the saying goes, there is no subsitute for CI.
A 7.3l can make over a 1000hp, Its not a heui but a full mech version. |
There are two of them that i know of, Double Overtime and a black and silver single cab. Both are wild trucks!
Nathan |
Common rail 7.3L would have been sweet.
|
I've been hearing one is in the works -- but have no clue as to who, where, or what :(
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands