Diesel Bombers

Diesel Bombers (https://www.dieselbombers.com/)
-   12 Valve 2nd Gen Dodge Cummins 94-98 (https://www.dieselbombers.com/12-valve-2nd-gen-dodge-cummins-94-98/)
-   -   parallel turbo (https://www.dieselbombers.com/12-valve-2nd-gen-dodge-cummins-94-98/129472-parallel-turbo.html)

scottmorgan 01-22-2016 11:14 AM

parallel turbo
 
I am building a 1978 F250 with a 1996 12v Cummins..

I want to be in the 500 hp range..

the p-pump will be great for my fuel supply but I don't want a bunch of black smoke..

last time I built a Cummins is was a vp 24v with computer to limit fuel until boost lit..


I want to run parallel hx30 to make the boost and cfm keep the egt low and still have quick spool...


what are your thoughts?

I would split the exhaust manifold..

if anyone has ran parallel I would love to hear the pros and cons...

Thanks,

Scott Morgan

wpg6.5 01-22-2016 12:39 PM

I think there's very few people who have actually run parellel set ups. I've been curious about the idea tho. For a cheap quick spooling 500hp 2 hx35's would work. As long has you have to fab skills to make 2 equal length header sections and can fit it under the hood should be golden.

Capt Kirk 01-22-2016 05:32 PM

This may be a stupid question. Would splitting the manifold and running two turbo's accomplish anything? Each turbo would be relying on half an engine to boost...wouldn't that affect the boost from each turbo? Isn't the goal to reduce the restriction to the exhaust while maximizing the boost? Wouldn't one properly sized turbo powered by all 6 cylinders be less restrictive and generate the desired boost. I understand larger turbos spool slower. To exaggerate the topic...would 6 small turbos...one bolted to each exhaust port be better than one properly sized big turbo? This post isn't anything other than me learning a bit more

94 12valve 01-22-2016 05:58 PM


Originally Posted by scottmorgan (Post 1106941)
I am building a 1978 F250 with a 1996 12v Cummins..

I want to be in the 500 hp range..

the p-pump will be great for my fuel supply but I don't want a bunch of black smoke..

last time I built a Cummins is was a vp 24v with computer to limit fuel until boost lit..


I want to run parallel hx30 to make the boost and cfm keep the egt low and still have quick spool...


what are your thoughts?

I would split the exhaust manifold..

if anyone has ran parallel I would love to hear the pros and cons...

Thanks,

Scott Morgan

It has been done on some pulling motors that turn high rpm's and have a few more cubes. Also has been done on many gas motors that also like to turn some rpms. For what your wanting to do its not the best option, the turbos you listed would not come up on boost until way too late in your power band killing all your bottom end. To make this work you will need much smaller turbos, than the issue you will run into will be limited compressor flow and compressor wheels that don't like high PR's.

A good set of compounds like a he351 over a s471 or gt42 would be a way better option.


Originally Posted by wpg6.5 (Post 1106944)
I think there's very few people who have actually run parellel set ups. I've been curious about the idea tho. For a cheap quick spooling 500hp 2 hx35's would work. As long has you have to fab skills to make 2 equal length header sections and can fit it under the hood should be golden.

Two HX35's would be way too big. Look at guys in the TDI world that run hx35's the turbo doesn't come to life till extremely high in the power band. Would be about the same on a 3cyl Cummins possibly even later.


Originally Posted by Capt Kirk (Post 1106956)
This may be a stupid question. Would splitting the manifold and running two turbo's accomplish anything? Each turbo would be relying on half an engine to boost...wouldn't that affect the boost from each turbo? Isn't the goal to reduce the restriction to the exhaust while maximizing the boost? Wouldn't one properly sized turbo powered by all 6 cylinders be less restrictive and generate the desired boost. I understand larger turbos spool slower. To exaggerate the topic...would 6 small turbos...one bolted to each exhaust port be better than one properly sized big turbo? This post isn't anything other than me learning a bit more

One properly sized turbo would be the best option. while you could get the same or more flow from 6 small turbos they would only be fed by 1 piston each ... meaning 1 time every 720* the small turbine would receive energy. This results in very little energy transferred to the turbine and little drive for the compressor wheel.

scottmorgan 01-23-2016 08:38 AM

"A good set of compounds like a he351 over a s471 or gt42 would be a way better option."

how much boost does this setup make?
how does the exhaust flow once the large turbo lights?

and just to clarify I was talking about putting two small turbo on not two hx35..
I was also going to keep the exhaust separate and merge the intake just before the inner cooler..

oh and I'm pretty sure I can fab anything..

wpg6.5 01-23-2016 09:55 AM

A he351 s400 series compound kit is capable of a lot with crazy fast spooling. They have kits out there to put them in and come with turbo drains, feed lines etc. Although you are putting it in a fod but still not that bad to do. I'm about to do a 351 over a s475 and we are shooting for about 650 horse and over 1300 foot pounds. The he351 are torque monsters due to their incredible spool up. I believe most compounds like this are 70 psi or so. Depending on the fuel avalible to spin them. And the exhaust just exits the s400 and goes into the exhaust system

94 12valve 01-23-2016 10:16 AM


Originally Posted by scottmorgan (Post 1107003)
"A good set of compounds like a he351 over a s471 or gt42 would be a way better option."

how much boost does this setup make?
how does the exhaust flow once the large turbo lights?

and just to clarify I was talking about putting two small turbo on not two hx35..
I was also going to keep the exhaust separate and merge the intake just before the inner cooler..

oh and I'm pretty sure I can fab anything..

Overall boost depends on the rest of your set up. Once the large turbo lights the exhaust is pushed out the exhaust pipe.

http://s388.photobucket.com/user/94_12valve/media/twins.jpg.html
I understand what you were saying about how to fab up the two chargers in your original post its still not the best option.

Jet A Fuel 01-23-2016 10:59 AM

I looked at your pictures in your album and I find it a great idea to run smaller turbos for quicker spool especially on a tow rig or general work truck. It is interesting that the new Ford V6 SHO gasser does just that one little turbo on each exhaust manifold outlet flange. :tu:

Jet A Fuel 01-23-2016 11:05 AM


Originally Posted by 94 12valve (Post 1107017)
Overall boost depends on the rest of your set up. Once the large turbo lights the exhaust is pushed out the exhaust pipe.

twins.jpg Photo by 94_12valve | Photobucket

I understand what you were saying about how to fab up the two chargers in your original post its still not the best option.

That is a piece of art nice compound set up.:tu: hate to even see it get dusty.

94 12valve 01-23-2016 12:21 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Jet A Fuel (Post 1107025)
I looked at your pictures in your album and I find it a great idea to run smaller turbos for quicker spool especially on a tow rig or general work truck. It is interesting that the new Ford V6 SHO gasser does just that one little turbo on each exhaust manifold outlet flange. :tu:

Here is a dyno sheet of the eco boost. Take a look at where peak torque and peak power are made. Unless you plan on turning that kind of rpm than you will not like this set up.




Originally Posted by Jet A Fuel (Post 1107026)
That is a piece of art nice compound set up.:tu: hate to even see it get dusty.

For the record I did not make that set up.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands