Diesel Bombers

Diesel Bombers (https://www.dieselbombers.com/)
-   Diesel Engine Conversions (https://www.dieselbombers.com/diesel-engine-conversions/)
-   -   V2203 RX7 - Fate (https://www.dieselbombers.com/diesel-engine-conversions/120178-v2203-rx7-fate.html)

redveloce 06-03-2014 01:17 PM

Sorry for going AWOL, I took a week off work was off the grid...

I'm posting my reply in the EPS topic.

fijitec 06-10-2014 03:13 PM

looks good

redveloce 06-12-2014 01:41 PM

2 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Beagle (Post 1062889)
Hey Red, quick question if I may? On the FC, how far is it from the crossmember to the firewall? I'm sorta looking at FB's and FC's and wondering if the carrier oil pan might be made to fit behind the crossmember or drag link. I'm not beyond trimming the firewall for it if it's close. Thanks in advance!

Sorry, I missed this!

I haven't measured, but I did mock it up with a cardboard box when I first got the car back. IIRC, it would be an inch or so too long to clear the crossmember with the carrier pan.

Here's a picture with the "engine" butted against the stock transmission. It's not very clear, but there was still a few inches of firewall clearance. Any other transmission will be a lot shorter, so moving it back will be beneficial or necessary anyway. If you're willing to clearance the firewall, then it MIGHT fit... A secondary consideration is how the mushroomed bottom of the pan may restrict options for exhaust routing. Hopefully I'll have some time to play with it some more and get some definite information soon.

Attachment 32279


Here is a reference picture of the empty engine bay. I need to take some more pictures. I've stripped out all of the unnecessary crap, and cleaned it since I took these. After typing all of the stuff out above, I noticed how the crossmember goes back along side the engine, and I'm starting to remember that it may be too narrow for the carrier pan farther back as well.

Attachment 32280

redveloce 06-23-2014 11:48 AM

5 Attachment(s)
Rangmar dropped off the new engine yesterday. 1100hrs! :jump:

Attachment 32233

Attachment 32234


I also did some fitment tests with the stock Carrier pan. It looks like it would fit if the stock mounting ears were cut off, and with some trimming to the seam on the cross member and possibly a little firewall clearancing. The distance between the firewall and the crossmember is pretty much identical to the length of the Kubota block. One big challenge to having the engine back that far would be that one of the heater core outlets come out of the firewall directly behind the engine. I'll probably just use a bobcat pan clearanced for the crossmember in front, so I can position the engine an inch or or so from the firewall.

The pictures are a little deceiving with the oil pan sitting on the ground. The rear of the pan is at, or possible a little under the edge of the firewall. the front is right at the seam for the crossmember.

Attachment 32235

Attachment 32236

Attachment 32237

Beagle 06-24-2014 03:48 PM

excellent information, thank you!

redveloce 07-07-2014 11:57 AM

1 Attachment(s)
It looks like I'm still having trouble with my turbo adapter. The bottom of the pipe is broke away from the base all of the way around. I think I can eliminate vibration stress as a possibility this time, since the braces are fine. My theory is that heat expansion on the longer braces tore the pipe from the base. I'm ordering some 11 gauge pipe to possibly use without bracing.

Attachment 32168

dieselxj 07-07-2014 07:19 PM


Originally Posted by redveloce (Post 1066899)
It looks like I'm still having trouble with my turbo adapter. The bottom of the pipe is broke away from the base all of the way around. I think I can eliminate vibration stress as a possibility this time, since the braces are fine. My theory is that heat expansion on the longer braces tore the pipe from the base. I'm ordering some 11 gauge pipe to possibly use without bracing.

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c1...psovmmr5gk.jpg

Hey red do you think the bend is causing more trouble, or just that the pipe is not thick enough? My pipe is just a short straight piece, but pretty thin walled pipe.

redveloce 07-07-2014 07:26 PM

I'm really not sure. Are you using the turbo manifold? My turbo wouldn't fit without the bend.

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

JesterGrin_1 07-08-2014 04:09 PM

Since I welded Jet Air Craft I will tell you what I feel it is even though you will not believe me.

The crack as shown looks to be in the metal itself at the connection between the weld and the tubing. And it also looks as though it was done with a TIG.

I would weld it using Oxy/Acetylene as that spreads out the heat and will not make that small area brittle as in this case. Also do not force cool it. Instead just let it air cool.

redveloce 07-08-2014 04:41 PM

I'm actually thinking along the same lines.

After doing some research on similar problems, it seems to be more commonly caused by contamination. That seems to be supported by the fact that the crack started right where the original crack was that we repaired, but there's no way to know for sure.

We're not set up for gas welding, but it's getting a new 11g pipe and will be meticulously cleaned before welding this time!

JesterGrin_1 07-08-2014 05:05 PM

An ARC welder might do better. But TIG in applications like this is not a good thing. But if the metal is very thick say 3/16ths it might have a shot. But I would V Grind the material before welding and then do a fillet weld.

I know you are a Smart guy. But I will attempt to explain this a bit further even though I am no Teacher and bad at it lol. But with a TIG the heat area and welding area is very small and therefore keeps the high heat in the one small area of the weld. This is why in this case the crack is right at the edge of the weld and the original material as it becomes brittle there. Where as in Oxy/Acetylene it spreads the heat out a great distance from the weld so it will not cause a brittle area.

For these very reasons when I build a smaller Aircraft Air Frame I use Oxy/Acetylene as an Aircraft Airframe will twist and bend all over the place with stress. If I used a TIG it would fall apart in the air of which is normally not a good thing lol.

redveloce 07-09-2014 12:03 PM


Originally Posted by JesterGrin_1 (Post 1067029)
If I used a TIG it would fall apart in the air of which is normally not a good thing lol.

Awe, where's your sense of adventure?

Yeah, I'm definitely not a welder, so I have a professional welder buddy do all of my critical stuff. He mostly does TIG, so I'm not sure what else he's set up to do.

The material I should be receiving today is 1/8" wall compared to the 1/16" wall stuff that it's using now.

JesterGrin_1 07-09-2014 10:06 PM

1/16ths wall. Ok I will not say a thing lol. But the 1/8" should work well. But then again many call me the Tank Builder lol. I tend to make things a Bit Stronger than needed. As I do not like things to BREAK lol.

redveloce 07-09-2014 10:46 PM

It was the thickest that I could find before. Now Columbia River Mandrel Bending has the thicker stuff.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Beagle 07-10-2014 03:43 AM

I'm looking at an '86 five lug car and the 4.10's are just scaring me. I am not sure I want to swing the conversion to a solid axle or the 8.8 center section costs and that seems like a lot of gear to me! I think the low 3.xx Mazda diesel truck gear that some say will fit is a unicorn. :)

Where would you say the meat of the powerband is in the Kubota? I was thinking I wanted it at or around 2150 +/- 50 rpm at 75. Thanks for all of your pictures and help by the way!

redveloce 07-10-2014 09:13 AM


Originally Posted by Beagle (Post 1067159)
I'm looking at an '86 five lug car and the 4.10's are just scaring me. I am not sure I want to swing the conversion to a solid axle or the 8.8 center section costs and that seems like a lot of gear to me! I think the low 3.xx Mazda diesel truck gear that some say will fit is a unicorn. :)

The autos had 3.91 gears, so that would help a little. With the 4.10's and a T5 from a Camaro with a .63 OD I'll be turning 2084RPM at 60, which is the speed limit here. I can see that being a problem somewhere with a higher speed limit, 75 would be 2605/4.10 2484/3.91. The 8.8 center section swap isn't that bad when you consider the amount of fabrication you're doing just for the engine swap.

I haven't heard about the diesel gears, I'll have to look into it.


Originally Posted by Beagle (Post 1067159)
Where would you say the meat of the powerband is in the Kubota?

I think that depends on the turbo and other factors. My experience is that it pulls pretty well from about 1500, but really starts to rip around 2100 and keeps getting stronger until I shift because I'm too scared to rev it any higher. I've had it to somewhere around 3600.

Ideally for best cruising mileage I'd want it below 2000RPM. There's just no way it would push the air at highway speed in my Jeep at that RPM though, but I bet it wouldn't have any problem in an RX7.

FTE 07-11-2014 07:38 PM

My Ranger's "sweet spot" seems to be @ 1900-2100 rpm's and gets the best mpg's there.

redveloce 09-04-2014 12:52 PM

Well, I ended up getting a deal that I couldn't pass up on car that fills many of the roles that I had intended for the RX7, so I think I'll be pickling the car and storing it for a future project.

That leaves me with a spare low hour engine. While the engine in the Jeep is strong, it's been subjected to a lot of stress and abuse through testing different configurations in the 20,000 miles it's ran, including finding the boot popped off the intake of the turbo after a dusty off road excursion one time early on. It has a fair amount of blowby at idle.

I've been thinking about doing some work to the spare engine and swapping them out just to get a fresh start. I'd like to do compression tests on both engines to get an idea of where they stand. I'll definitely pull the other engine apart to refresh all of the gaskets, but some of the other work I'm considering is:

Pistons ceramic coated
Piston skirts impregnated with dry film lubricant
Combustion chamber & applicable associated areas of head ceramic coated


I haven't decided, but I may go full monty and integrate a Civic/Insight IMA hybrid system just for fun.

I'm open to thoughts and ideas.

redveloce 10-07-2014 01:31 AM

I need to try and stop by here at least once a month! Nothing new, but I finally unloaded the memory cards from this summer.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands