Tire Size 315=
#12
Awesome bro! I can't afford the toyo MT's I don't think, but the Hankook I can.
Scott
»»»»»»»»»»»««««««««««««
AutoMerged DoublePost
»»»»»»»»»»»««««««««««««
I take that back... The hankook MT's are only $10 less per tire than the toyo MT.... For that price difference, I would rather just go with the toyo MT.
Scott
Scott
»»»»»»»»»»»««««««««««««
AutoMerged DoublePost
»»»»»»»»»»»««««««««««««
I take that back... The hankook MT's are only $10 less per tire than the toyo MT.... For that price difference, I would rather just go with the toyo MT.
Scott
Last edited by dieseljunkie; 07-04-2007 at 05:48 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#15
#16
I have had my Toyo's, 315 x 70 x 17, E load range on for 11k now and still have tread left (maybe 15% gone). I do know that doing burnouts with them eats them up a lot faster then a A/T type of tire. You can tell by the marks they leave on the road. A/T will leave plenty of rubber but you can see the tread spaces on the road between the rubber whereas the Toyo's M/T just leave DARK BLACK MARKS on the road and no spacing between the treads. Back mudflap also has a lot more rubber on it compared to A/T tires. Harder to spin also, but truck still does it.
#17
i remember seeing a pic of them awhile back. what kind are you running again and where'd you get 'em cuz i likes em!? 'splain jurself to me mang.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post