Cummins vs. Powerstroke - Page 2 - Diesel Bombers

Go To The Home Page About Us Join The Bombers

Vote for us on Top Diesel Sites Join our Facebook Group Follow Us On Twitter Subscribe to our RSS feed Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel Add us as your friend on Myspace Bookmark us on Delicious Bookmark us on Digg Link To Our Family Of Sites Invite Your Friends Check Out Our Blog Add Diesel Bombers To Your Network

Bomb Site Regional & Clubs Shop Bombers Classifieds Directory Casino & Board Games [0] Arcade
Go Back   Diesel Bombers > Bombers Forums > General Diesel Related
Forgot Password? Join Us!
Register Blogs Mark Forums Read Chat Room

General Diesel Related Discussion for All General Diesel Topics , No Make or Year Specific Discussions , These Topic Should be General Diesel Related

So much misinformation, so little time. -... JOIN NOW TO REMOVE TRACER

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 09-15-2009, 10:00 PM
Mr. Miyagi's Avatar
GET WELL SOON, TRAVIS!
Status: gonna go postal on Kenworth Northwest

   


Default

So much misinformation, so little time.

-

Mr. Miyagi's Sig:You can have it cheap, right, or Tuesday. Pick two.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-15-2009, 10:10 PM
00' Quad Cab's Avatar
Along for the ride

   

Default

I know that an inline motor will usually make better torque than a V configuration because you are not running multiple plains of torque, meaning the pistons are all on the same plain while in motion.

The fact still stands that the Cummins is a Med. duty where the Stroke is a lighter duty. -

00' Quad Cab's Sig:Jason Hayes, Aberdeen WA

2000 Quad Cab 4x4 LB CTD Auto
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-15-2009, 10:30 PM
polish pete's Avatar
Diesel Fan

   

Default

Originally Posted by Stumblefoot View Post
Looking back at the gassers a 300CI inline 6 cyl has more torque than a 302CI V8, the V8 claimed more HP. 99.9% of all class 8 trucks use an inline 6 cyl, more torque, longer lasting.
not true, scania a europeon truck company makes 600hp out of there 15 liter v8 as a factory option mack made a v8 cummins makes v8's too, its all in the application the way i see it. -

polish pete's Sig:rocking a 2000 cummins 5speed baby.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-29-2009, 09:00 PM
CSIPSD's Avatar
Moderator
Status: Broke again!!!

   


Default

Originally Posted by Mr. Miyagi View Post
So much misinformation, so little time.

....


One thing...

Injection system. -

CSIPSD's Sig:01 F-250 SC,175k,16gauges,AFE-2,Modded H2e,6.0 IC,Hybrids,Water inj,Swamp tuned,Studs,Forged rods,910 springs,4"dual's,Aero,6" tip's,100 axl tank,4" lift,37" TOYO MT's

With TN BB and old set up...467hp-1066tq


Joe-AKA Gauge whore
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-29-2009, 10:24 PM
MotorOilMcCall's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Status: on bed rest until further notice.

   

Default

How about hte fact than an I-6 has 7 Main Bearings compared to a V-8's 5 main bearings? That makes a big difference...

Cummins does make a V-8... The 903. Its nothing to brag about, and anyone who has one wishes they could swap it for an 855 I-6. Trust me, I've run, and worked on both, and the 855 is a better engine all around. The 903 can really make some HP with a bit of tuning though... Shame a tractor doesn't need HP. -

MotorOilMcCall's Sig:99 2500 RC 4x4 5-Spd - Quad XZT, Leveling Kit, 35" X-Terrains, Ranch Hand Bumper, PPE Lift Pump

98 3500 12V QC 5x5 5-Spd - 191 DV's, 370 EDM's, 4K GSK, 17* Timing, SBC 3850 Puller Dual Disk, Big Input Shaft - SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:29 AM
Diesel Enthusiast
Status: Just another day in the hood

   

Default

Again, relatively new here and not that familiar with the diesels yet; however, I do have a 1989 Toyota FJ62 LANDCRUISER with an inline 6.

That sucker will pull your house off it's foundation with little to no effort!

Sucks down fuel like a wino in a distillery, and wont hit much over 90 mph, but it'll last forever with minimal maintenance (for a gasser).

There are tons of them out there with over 200k of heavy duty use (brush, outback, S. America, etc).

Lets just say that it will outlast the body of the truck! -

Last edited by SAR Pirate; 10-01-2009 at 05:23 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:55 PM
Mr. Miyagi's Avatar
GET WELL SOON, TRAVIS!
Status: gonna go postal on Kenworth Northwest

   


Default

Some of you guys just crack me up.... -
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-30-2009, 11:54 PM
Captain Call's Avatar
Diesel Wrench
Status: soooo much cooler online!!!!

   

Default

X2 -

Captain Call's Sig:IT SHAKES RATTLES AND ROLLS
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:52 AM
Diesel Fan

   

Default

Ok, with the 5.9, obviously its smaller than a 7.3, 6.0 or 6.4. But it has two less cylinders, so what do they do? Make the existing six bigger to create as much power as a v8. plus its less moving parts in the 5.9. I always thought the 7.3 fords had alot more power personally though. -
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-01-2009, 11:04 AM
K50's Avatar
K50 K50 is offline
Diesel Bomber
Status: livin large...with large bills that is.

   

Default

Man that "less moving parts than a V8" argument is bs!! If I hear that one more time my head will explode....because by THAT logic, that a "6 cylinder has less moving parts than a v8" and is therefore subjected to less friction and more efficient and powerful etc etc, a ONE CYLINDER engine should be the most efficient of them ALL!!! -

K50's Sig:2003 Chevrolet 2500HD Duramax 4x4 extended cab long box. No cat, 56 gallon Titan tank, Bully Dog Tuner installed on Tow mode.
Changes to come soon: 2" Cognito front lift, MBRP 4" or 5" exhaust.
True North Strong and Free
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-01-2009, 11:58 AM
Wyatt Earp's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Status: Is wondering where Whit comes up with this stuff?

   
View Member's FaceBook Profile

Default

Actually, it has more to do with the inline vs. V configuration. Inlines are more efficient in their delivery of power. This is why most, not all Class 5 and 8 OTR's are inlines as well as most earth movers and stationary power plants. -

Wyatt Earp's Sig:Wyatt Earp
Smoke show: 2002 Dodge CTD
Daily Driver: 2003 VW Golf TDI
Other New Car: 2008 MB R320 CDI - Diesel Luxury
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-01-2009, 01:25 PM
MotorOilMcCall's Avatar
Diesel Bomber
Status: on bed rest until further notice.

   

Default

K50, I think the less moving parts argument is more about reliability than power. -
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-01-2009, 01:59 PM
K50's Avatar
K50 K50 is offline
Diesel Bomber
Status: livin large...with large bills that is.

   

Default

That would make much more sense. -
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-01-2009, 03:30 PM
kazairl's Avatar
BOMBARDIER

   


Default

That comparison picture is good for giving the cummins guy a warm fuzzy feeling but it is other wise bullchit.


Afterall a Cummins must support the same amount of horsepower as the V8s but minus 2 cylinders. OF COURSE THE RODS ARE GOING TO BE BIGGER! -

kazairl's Sig:02 6 speed High output 4.10 gears AFE stage 2 Intake AFE 4" straightpipe Edge Jammers 100HP Injectors Quadzilla Adrenaline BD short shift 285/75 R16 Wild Country A/T on Eagle Alloys Some aftermarket speakers and a couple subs

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-01-2009, 04:49 PM
86k5's Avatar
Diesel Fan

   

Default

i dont really know the reason why but a inline motor is just better period when it comes to how long it last and some can outrun v8s. (i know im gonna get crap but) look at all the older cars and trucks like the 60s, 70s, and early 80s. everybody i know runs chevys esp. the 250 inline. my buddy outrun a 318 in a jeep on day in his worn out 66 c10 long bed with a 3 speed that gets hung if you shift with any force at all. my uncle neer opened the hoo period on a 250 and hes still drives it all the time and it cranks right up. long story for a simple inlines are better period -
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.

Copyright And Legal Notice Our Corporate Affiliates

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.1
Diesel Bombers ® - All Content Protected Under Intellectual Property Rights Law of Registered Trademarks
Reg. No. 3,494,401 Cls. 100, 101 & 104 Under Int. Cl. 38

vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225