Diesel Bombers SIGN UP NOW Diesel Bombers

Go To The Home Page About Us Join The Bombers

Vote for us on Top Diesel Sites Join our Facebook Group Follow Us On Twitter Subscribe to our RSS feed Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel Add us as your friend on Myspace Bookmark us on Delicious Bookmark us on Digg Link To Our Family Of Sites Invite Your Friends Check Out Our Blog Add Diesel Bombers To Your Network

Bomb Site Regional & Clubs Reviews Shop Bombers Classifieds Directory Casino & Board Games [0] Arcade
Go Back   Diesel Bombers > Ford Powerstroke > Ford Powerstroke 08-Up 6.4L
Forgot Password? Join Us!
Register Blogs Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Ford Powerstroke 08-Up 6.4L Discussion of 6.4 Liter Ford Powerstroke Turbo Diesels

Originally Posted by STROKETECH This fuel miliage issue is not across the board. More owners then not are doing better then 14. I have not heard of any doing better than 12.... JOIN NOW TO REMOVE TRACER

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 07-31-2007, 11:42 AM
Vegistrokin Bombardier

   


Default

Originally Posted by STROKETECH View Post
This fuel miliage issue is not across the board. More owners then not are doing better then 14.
I have not heard of any doing better than 12.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CHenry For This Useful Post:


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

  #17  
Old 07-31-2007, 08:09 PM
JON's Avatar
JON JON is offline
Member

   


Default !

Well Clay ol buddy ol pal. I run across a few of em. I wouldnt shit ya buddy!

JON's Sig:
Originally Posted by Dusten View Post
I do look at the gauge jackass!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JON For This Useful Post:
  #18  
Old 08-01-2007, 08:01 AM
redneck817's Avatar
Diesel Fan

   

Default

I thank you all for this bit of information you all have provieded me. You all have helped me realize i need to think very hard bout my nest step towards a newer truck, but for now I will stick with my 5ton Dump till i can get home.


THANKS EVERYONE
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-02-2007, 11:47 AM
redneck817's Avatar
Diesel Fan

   

Default

Are there any chips for this motor yet or anything along those lines and in a manual what gauges would be best i know boost pyro and anything else that i should monitor????????????
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-02-2007, 04:20 PM
Johnny Cetane's Avatar
BOMBARDIER
Status: meh.

   
View Member's Albums View Member's FaceBook Profile


Default

there's some tunes coming. i believe super chips is working on one that makes the DPF logic disappear. of course it's going to be "off road only"

Johnny Cetane's Sig:
Three Time Survivor Of Excrement Creek
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnny Cetane For This Useful Post:
  #21  
Old 08-02-2007, 05:25 PM
redneck817's Avatar
Diesel Fan

   

Default

sure ill keep it off road (very long drive way)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:08 PM
JON's Avatar
JON JON is offline
Member

   


Default !

Tune em, run em and I'll fix em!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-02-2007, 09:29 PM
redneck817's Avatar
Diesel Fan

   

Default

Originally Posted by STROKETECH View Post
Tune em, run em and I'll fix em!
Well in that case do you think i could drop a 6.0 in a '78 Ford Ranger that already has a big block in it
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-02-2007, 10:13 PM
JON's Avatar
JON JON is offline
Member

   


Default UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmm

I would recomend a 7.3 over a 6.0. Lots less wiring.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-03-2007, 12:00 AM
redneck817's Avatar
Diesel Fan

   

Default

I wonder how hard that would be to do? Any tips ona year to got with? cause i know of a Cummins kit, i havent heard anything on Powerstroke one yet.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-03-2007, 07:54 AM
JON's Avatar
JON JON is offline
Member

   


Default Well

as long as your donor truck had the trans, pcm, ficm, wiring harness and all the other goodies it would be feesable. The hardest part is all the wiring. It would be cool. I would go with an '04 1/2 and up just to make it easier on you.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JON For This Useful Post:
  #27  
Old 08-03-2007, 11:40 AM
redneck817's Avatar
Diesel Fan

   

Default

Now i just have to save up and start looking for the best one i can get bugets suck second job here i come when i get back in the states

»»»»»»»»»»»««««««««««««
AutoMerged DoublePost
»»»»»»»»»»»««««««««««««

I just looked at the superchips site and they already got the early edtion tuner out for the 6.4

Last edited by redneck817; 08-03-2007 at 11:40 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-16-2007, 04:02 PM
Newbie

   

Default

Face it guys none of us really know how good or bad the new 6.4 is going to be. The 6.0 was a disaster for Ford, and there is still tons of rumors about this motor that is keeping sales of used 6.0 at a record low pace. Now with that said I personally don't have a clue if those rumors are true or not. I have a friend with a 6.0 and nobody could ask for better service from a truck than he has gotten, on the other hand another friend bought his 6.0 truck on the advice of the first friend and that truck and motor could not be worse.

I "HAD" a 2008 F-450 with the new 6.4 motor, my problems with that truck had nothing what so ever to do with the motor. It was a King Ranch 4X4 with all of the bells and whistles. A beautiful truck I might add. Trouble was I bought this truck for the advertised almost 5,900 lb payload, way higher than my 2001 Dodge 3500 DRW which was at 3,300 lbs. Only thing about that payload it was a complete and total joke. If Ford thinks that they can say 5,900 lbs and its so, well they got another think coming. I hated that truck it would not do one tenth what my Dodge would do. It looked cool and that King Ranch leather is to die for, but Ford lie'd about the truck so I traded it on another Dodge with only 2,225 miles on it. And damn glad to see it GOOOO!!

Gunny
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-16-2007, 05:12 PM
Benjamin's Avatar
Administrator
Status: My neck Ain't Broke But it WILL BE

   


Default

Originally Posted by Gunnyrs View Post
Trouble was I bought this truck for the advertised almost 5,900 lb payload, way higher than my 2001 Dodge 3500 DRW which was at 3,300 lbs. Only thing about that payload it was a complete and total joke. If Ford thinks that they can say 5,900 lbs and its so, well they got another think coming. I hated that truck it would not do one tenth what my Dodge would do.Gunny
i've heard that the vehicle manufactures rate the payload rating WITHOUT the bed or a full tank of fuel....... does anyone know the truth behind this? i heard this from a service manager at a dealership i use to sell cars for because i sold a new 1/2ton truck that was rated at XXXXlbs and he dearched a set of springs and we replaced them under warranty and told him next time it would be on him due to it being overloaded (he hauled produce) and after it was fixed he rode up to the farmers market and loaded his truck with all the weight centered over the rear axle...... it was loaded with 250 pounds LESS (weighed on certified scales) than the payload rating and it had almost de-arched the springs as the truck was sitting on the bumpstops in the rear. the manufacture's rep come down to look at it and his responce was take the payload rating, subtract the weight of the bed and a tank of fuel and that is the accual payload rating...... true or false guys?


EDIT - sorry for the highjack.....

Benjamin's Sig:

REMEMBER SOME PEOPLE ARE ALIVE SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO SHOOT THEM.



Last edited by Benjamin; 08-16-2007 at 05:15 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-16-2007, 05:53 PM
Newbie

   

Default

I think --- key word being "Think" that that would be FALSE. The payload rating of any light duty pick-up and all 3500 as well as the F-450 Ford now being produced as a complete truck by FORD, are light duty trucks. These gain there "Payload" from there GVWR. As an example my 2001 HO 6 Speed Cummins Dodege had a GVWR of 11,000 lbs, the truck itself weiged on the scales with full fuel 7,700 lbs this gave me a useful payload of 3,300 lbs, in the Dodge. Ford advertises there new factory built F450 as having a 16,000 lb GVWR that is the way they come up with a payload of 6,120 lbs on 2X4 and 5,820 in 4X4. I think there figures are probably right as my F450 weighed with full fuel 8,256 lbs, so its close. Trouble was there is no way in the world that, that Ford truck would haul any where near that load.

Gunny

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.

Copyright And Legal Notice Links Of Interest

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Diesel Bombers - All Content Protected Under Intellectual Property Rights Law of Registered Trademarks
Reg. No. 3,494,401 Cls. 100, 101 & 104 Under Int. Cl. 38
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK WE HOLD NO LIABILITY FOR ANY CONTENT RIGHT, WRONG OR INDIFFERENT

vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265